Comments
on Complant
(under construction, very rough)

This Complaint was prepared by the law firm of B&K (Blankingship & Keith) for our trusting sister Jean Nader to sign (Jean O'Connell Nader, 350 Fourth Avenue, New Kensington, PA 15068, Tel 724-337-7537). This is an example of what she has been lead to believe.

Those who don't want the accounting exposed want me out because I try to expose the accounting, They want Jean Nader in because she would not try to expose the accounting. They use her as an unwitting cover.

The major justification used for removing me as Trustee is that I did not sell the Trust property and I did not pay the real estate taxes.

Why is this accounting fraud protected instead of the public? My Trusteeship was sabotaged by those in control from day one by them ignoring the Trust Deed. Not recognizing my Trust Deed, but not actually saying so, and not saying why it should not be recognized, but just ignoring it, rendered me powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property, which forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The sabotage consequences are made to appear as my fault. As if there were no Trust Deed to be ignored. The consequences of not selling the trust property and not paying the real estate taxes after I ran out of money are used to justify removing me as Trustee. The reader has to recognize this set up. This cause and effect. If the reader does not follow this, this is a good place to stop. Does the FBI and the DOJ recognize this set up? History suggests I will be killed and it made to appear as my fault unless a just power removes the secrecy and enforces the law. . . . . . . . . . . .Try to expose http://book467page191money.com and see what happens. Try to get the establishment to recognize this Deed or say why it should not be recognized http://www.book8307page1446deed.com . Try to get a just power to flush out this Complaint http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/complaint/complaint-home.html and enforce contract law.

This Complaint covers up accounting. The money trails from the proceeds of the Trust property will never be exposed. This Complaint says, in so many words, that I should be removed as Trustee for trying to expose the accounting.


To see how important "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . .659.97" is, see how many make it appear unimportant.


Page 7 from the Complaint.


Suggestion - Work with the condensed transcript version below this jpg version of the Complaint.

















Condensed transcript version of Complaint (Below)

"COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Jean Mary O'Connell Nader, by counsel, and brings this action pursuant to § 26-48 and 55-547.06 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) for the removal and appointment of a trustee, and in support thereof states the following.
Parties and Jurisdiction
1. Plaintiff Jean Mary O’Connell Nader ("Jean") and *Defendants Anthony Miner O’Connell ("Anthony") and Sheila Ann O'Connell ("Sheila") are the children of Harold A. O’Connell ("Mr. O’Connell"), who died in 1975, and Jean M. O'Connell ("Mrs. O'Connell"), who died on September 15, 1991. 2. The trusts that are the subject of this action are: (a) the trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell dated April 11, 1974, and admitted to probate in this Court on June 18, 1975; and (b) a Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, which was recorded among the land records of this Court in Deed Book 8845 at Page 1449.

Closing these trusts covers up the accounting for these trusts.
Items 2-9 make it appear that the Trust Deed does not exist. 

3. Jean, Sheila, and Anthony are the beneficiaries of both of the trusts and, therefore, are the parties interested in this proceeding.
4. During their lifetimes, Mr. and Mrs. O'Connell owned as *tenants in common a parcel of unimproved real estate identified by Tax Map No. 0904-0 1-00 17 and located near the Franconia area of Fairfax County, Virginia and consisting of approximately 15 acres (the "Property").
5. After his death in 1975, a 46.0994% interest in the Property deriving fiom Mr, O'Connell's original 50% share was transferred to a trust created under his Last Will and Testament (the "Harold Trust"), of which Anthony serves as trustee. A copy of the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
6. Mrs. O'Connell held a life interest in the Harold Trust and, upon her death in 1991, the trust assets were to be distributed in equal shares to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony as remainder beneficiaries. Although other assets of the Harold Trust were distributed to the remainder beneficiaries, the trust's 46.0994% interest in the Property has never been distributed to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony in accordance with the terms of the Harold Trust.
7. After Mrs. O'Connell's death, her 53.9006% interest in the Property passed to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony in equal shares, pursuant to the terms of her Last Will and Testament and Codicil thereto, which was admitted to probate in this Court on December 10, 1991.
8. Thus, after Mrs. O'Connell's death, Jean, Sheila, and Anthony each owned a 17.96687% interest in the Property, and the Harold Trust continued to own a 49.0994% interest in the Property.
9. By a Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, Jean, Sheila, and Anthony, individually and in his capacity as trustee of the Harold Trust, created a Land Trust (the "Land Trust"), naming Anthony as initial trustee. A copy of the Land Trust Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated by reference herein. The Harold Trust, Jean, Sheila, and Anthony (individually) are the beneficiaries of the Land Trust.

Items 2-9 make it appear that the Trust Deed did not exist. http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

10. The Property was thereafter conveyed by Jean, Sheila, and Anthony, individually and as trustee of the Harold Trust, to Anthony, as trustee of the Land Trust, by a Deed dated October 16,1992 and recorded on October 23,1992 in Deed Book 8307 at Page 1446 among the land records for Fairfax County

Item 10 mentions the Trust Deed, but treats it as if it were of no significance. This is the only mention of the Deed.

11. As trustee under the Land Trust, Anthony was granted broad powers and responsibilities in connection with the Property, including the authority and obligation to sell the Property. Paragraph 4.04 of the Land Trust Agreement states, in part, as follows: "If the Property or any part thereof remains in this trust at the expiration of twenty (20) years from date hereof, the Trustee shall promptly sell the Property at a public sale after a reasonable public advertisement and reasonable notice thereof to the Beneficiaries.
12. To date, the Property has not been sold, and the Land Trust is due to expire on October 16, 2012.

My Trusteeship was sabotaged by those in control from day one by them ignoring the Trust Deed. It rendered me powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. http://www.book8307page1446deed.com.

13. According to Paragraph 9.03 of the Land Trust Agreement, the responsibility for payment of all real estate taxes on the Property is to be shared proportionately by the beneficiaries. However, if a beneficiary does not pay his or her share, the Land Trust Agreement provides: The Trustee will pay the shortfall and shall be reimbursed the principal plus 10% interest per annum. Trustee shall be reimbursed for any outstanding real estate tax shares or other Beneficiary shared expense still owed by any Beneficiary at settlement on the eventual sale of the property

Please read the Trust documents instead of the Complaint's version of them.

Real estate taxes are the most used vehicle for planting confusion and conflict in the accounting.

Accepting Jean Nader's checks made out to "County of Fairfax" would create an accounting entanglement. Accounting entanglements are used as wedge and takeover tools and as cover. It is unlike Jean Nader to insist on making her check out contrary to my request. Imagine if I asked her to sign a sales contract or deed.

To see if the real estate tax amount of $27,669.17 was just made up, have those who arrived at this figure show how they arrived at this figure. As of November 6, 2010, the individual beneficiaries owed these amounts in real estate taxes:

Sheila O'Connell owed me                    $ 83,568.24.
Jean Nader owned me                           $ 56,615.23.
Anthony O'Connell owed  fairfax         $   6,446.65   

To keep the accounting straight I paid the total real estate taxes for all the beneficiaries and Sheila OConnell and Jean OConnell were to reimburse me. Subtracting $6,446.65 from these three amounts (It's a wash) means Sheila O'Connell owed Anthony OConnell $77,121.59 in reimbursement, and Jean Nader owned Anthony OConnell $50,168.58 in reembursement, for a total of $127,290.17. As of November , 2010, the Trust owned Anthony OConnell $127,290.17. How was it calculated that Anthony OConnell owes $27,738.00? This is a difference of $155,028.17 Why is this OK?

14. For many years, Jean sent payment to Anthony for her share of the real estate taxes on the Property. Beginning in or about 1999, Anthony refused to accept her checks because they were made payable to "County of Fairfax." Anthony insisted that any checks for the real estate taxes be made payable to him individually, and he has returned or refused to forward Jean's checks to Fairfax County. Under the circumstances, Jean is unwilling to comply with Anthony's demands regarding the tax payments.

 

My accepting the check made out to "Fairfax County" would create an accounting entanglement. It would plant confusion and conflict in the accounting. It is the same pattern as "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust .......659.97" at bk467p192.




It is unlike Jean Nader to insist on making her check out contray to my request. I believe someone lead her. It puts me in the position of accepting an accounting entanglement or not getting reimbursed. Can you imagine my getting Jean Nader to sign a sales contract or a deed?

15. Anthony is not willing or has determined he is unable to sell the Property due to a mistaken interpretation of events and transactions concerning the Property and, upon information and belief, the administration of his mother's estate. Anthony's position remains intractable, despite court rulings against him, professional advice, and independent evidence. As a result, Anthony is unable to effectively deal with third parties and the other beneficiaries of the Land Trust.

The Trust Deed is ignored. It has been in the Court records since October 23, 1992. This renderred me powerless. It is not actually said that it is not recognized. No reason is given for it ot to be recognized. It is just ignored. This blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. This sabotaged my Trusteeship.. Why is it not recognized or it said why it should not be recognized? Ignoring this Deed rendered me powerless. It sabotaged my Trusteeship. It is made to appear as my fault. The sabotage is used to justify removing me as Trustee. The reader absolutely positively has to recognize this set up. If this cause and effect is not recognized this is a good place to stop.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com


16. In 2007, Anthony received a reasonable offer from a potential buyer to purchase the Property. Upon information and belief, Anthony became convinced of a title defect with the Property that, in his opinion, was an impediment to the sale of the Property. A title commitment issued by Stewart Title and Escrow on April 24,2007, attached hereto as Exhibit C, did not persuade Anthony that he, as the trustee of the Land Trust, had the power to convey the Property. Because of this and other difficulties created by Anthony, the Property was not sold.


Why say or imply that a Trustee should sign a sales contract document that states the Trustee is indidviually liable when the Trust documents clearly state the the Trustee is not individually liablle?

I spent several years with Bill Lynch and his Stewart Title Guaranty Company trying to get them to recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable.

 

 

this,

 

Title Compant trying

1that

 

17. Since 2007, it appears the only effort put forth by Anthony to sell the Property has been to post it for sale on a website he created, http://www.alexandriavirginial5acres.com

Please judge for yourself.

I'm guessing someone lead Jean Nader to believe this and then made it appear that Jean was the source. Please see my letter beloe with it's "I wonder if you wonder whether Jean Nader might have intentionally mislead you into brlieving that I have done little to sell Accotink, when it has become obvious that that is not true."



18. Since 2009, Anthony has failed to pay the real estate taxes for the Property as required by the Land Trust Agreement. Currently, the amount of real estate tax owed, including interest and penalties, is approximately $27,738.00
To see if the real estate tax amount of $27,669.17 was just made up, have those who arrived at this figure show how they arrived at this figure. As of November 6, 2010, the individual beneficiaries owed these amounts in real estate taxes:

Sheila O'Connell owed me                    $ 83,568.24.
Jean Nader owned me                           $ 56,615.23.
Anthony O'Connell owed  fairfax         $   6,446.65   

To keep the accounting straight I paid the total real estate taxes for all the beneficiaries and Sheila OConnell and Jean OConnell were to reimburse me. Subtracting $6,446.65 from these three amounts (It's a wash) means Sheila O'Connell owed Anthony OConnell $77,121.59 in reimbursement, and Jean Nader owned Anthony OConnell $50,168.58 in reembursement, for a total of $127,290.17. As of November , 2010, the Trust owned Anthony OConnell $127,290.17. How was it calculated that Anthony OConnell owes $27,738.00? This is a difference of $155,028.17 Why is this OK?

19. Anthony has stated that he purposely did not pay the real estate taxes in order to force a sale of the Property and clear up the alleged title defects .

If the implication is that I just decided not to pay the real estate taxes, that is not true. I did not pay the real estate taxes because I ran out of money because ignoring the deed blocked the sale of he property described in the deed.

 


20. Since the real estate taxes are more than two years delinquent, Anthony's failure to pay may result in a tax sale of the Property. Anthony was notified of this possibility by a notice dated October 26, 201 1, attached hereto as Exhibit D. In addition to the threatened tax sale, the Land Trust is incurring additional costs, including penalties, interest, and fees, that would not be owed if Anthony had paid the real estate taxes in a timely manner.

If the implication is that I just decided not to pay the real estate taxes, or that I didn't know that the taxes were due, that is not true. I did not pay the real estate taxes because I ran out of money because the deed is ignored.

(Below) This covert lien to Highland County, Virginia, takes covert control of my farm. The secrecy renders me powerless. I circled the date of May 11, 2012, because I was notifided by the Phoenix VA in Arizona on May 10, 2012, that my application for the poverty pension was virtually buried in amiguity and confuion. It could be a coincidence that I receivied two big financial hits at the same time (May 10-11, 202). I want to keep this simple so I won't go into the lien and buried pension application convergence here.

21. In May 20 12, Jean, through her counsel, wrote a letter to Anthony requesting that he cooperate with a plan to sell the Property or resign as trustee. To date, Anthony has not expressed a willingness to do either, and still maintains that the alleged title defect and other "entanglements" must be resolved before any action can be taken towards a sale of the Property

The signature cover of this accounting fraud is to use a trusting family member to unwittingly divide, destabilize, and disempower the family. In 25 years, not one member of the establishment has tried to stop our trusting sister from being used. Not one.


Count I: Removal of Anthony O'Connell as Trustee of Land Trust

This would, for one, cover up the accounting for the Land Trust. This is against the law in ways too numerous to mention.

22: The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 21 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
23. As trustee of the Land Trust, Anthony has a fiduciary duty to comply with the terms of the trust agreement, to preserve and protect the trust assets, and to exercise reasonable care, skill, and caution in the administration of the trust assets.
24. Anthony has breached his fiduciary duties by his unreasonable, misguided, and imprudent actions, including but not limited to, his failure to sell the Property and non-payment of the real estate taxes on the Property.
25. The breaches of duty by Anthony constitute good cause for his removal as trustee of the Land Trust. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:
A. That the Court remove Anthony Minor O'Connell as trustee under the Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, pursuant to 26-48 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended);

This is against the law.

B.That all fees payable to Anthony Minor O'Connell under the terms of the aforesaid Land Trust Agreement, including but not limited to, the trustee's compensation under paragraph 9.01, and all interest on advancements by the trustee to the trust for payment of real estate taxes pursuant to paragraph 9.03, be disallowed and deemed forfeited;

This is against the law of contracts.


C. That all costs incurred by Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader in this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees, be paid by the Land Trust; and

This is against the law.


D. For all such further relief as this Court deems reasonable and proper.

This is against the law.

Count 11: Removal of Anthony O'Connell as Trustee of the Trust under the Will of Harold A. O'Connell

This is against the law. puts the accountants and the colaborators in control of the money.

Why did the Trustee's Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report of June 16, 1994, and August 23, 2000, disappear after being received by the Court? See item 28.

26. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 25 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
27. The terms of the Harold Trust provide that, upon the death of Mrs. O'Connell, the assets are to be distributed to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony in equal shares. Notwithstanding the terms of the Harold Trust and the provisions for its termination, Anthony entered into the Land Trust Agreement in his capacity as trustee of the Harold Trust. As a result, upon the sale of the Property, Anthony can exercise greater control over the Harold Trust's share of the sale proceeds than if the parties held their beneficial interests in their individual capacities.

Why did the Trustee's Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report of June 16, 1994, and August 23, 2000, disappear after being received by the Court? See item 28.

28. Other than its status as beneficiary of the Land Trust, there is no reason for the continuation of the Harold Trust.

The Testamentary Trust under the Will of H. A. OConnell is not a beneficiary of the 1992 Virginia Land Trust.

Why did the Trustee's Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report of August 23, 2000, disappear after being received by the Court?

Why did the Trustee's actual 12th account dissapear after being received by the Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson?

Why is "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . 659.97" at bk467p192, approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson, not recognized?  

29. On August 8, 2000, an Eleventh Account for the Harold Trust was approved by the Commissioner of Accounts for the Circuit Court of Fairfax County and determined to be a final account.

(Above) On August 8, 2000, the Commisioner of Accounts changed my 1995 11th account from "This is not a final account'' to "This is a final Account" He did not inital or date his change so anyone looking at this would assome that I made the change.

(Below) The Commisioner's Report to the Judges describibg my 12th account (But not including my actual 12th account (red flag) makes my 12th account look bad. My Exception to the Commissioner's Report that contained my actual 12th Trust account and the Comissioner's Report of it to the Judges. for comparison, dissappeared after being excepted by the Court on August 23, 2000.
http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/9-exceptions2000disappeared.pdf



30. Anthony repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged the Commissioner's determination and requested, inter alia, that the Court and the Commissioner of Accounts investigate a debt of $659.97 that he alleged was owed to the Harold Trust by Mrs. O'Connell's estate. In these proceedings, the Commissioner stated, and the court agreed, that there was no evidence to support Anthony's claims that a debt existed and, if so, that it was an asset of the Harold Trust

The accounting entry "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . 659.97" was approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson, on March 20, 1993. It is an accounting entanglement. It is the intentional planting of confusion and conflict. The issue is not the amount. The issue is that they entangle. Who ever controls the entanglement (the accountants) controls the people and assets that are intangled.

An accounting entanglement is, among other things, cover. Small amounts are used to make them appear insignificant, as if the issue were the amount, and not that they cover and entangle. The accounting at bk467p191 is covered with these entanglements of small amounts. They cover the accounting trails. The accounting at bk467p191 has been concealed since 1993. To see how important it is try to get the acccountants to recognize the acounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 or any accounting trails for these numbers.

The Commisioner of Accounts approved these three items. That means he approved the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 three times. In the Estate accounting, the Commissioner approved the 816.00 and the 659.97 on March 20, 1993, at Book 467 page 192:

"Int fm Harold O'Connell Trust  .......................................... 816.00"
"Debt fm Harold O’Connell Trust  ...................................... 659.97"

In the Trust accounting, The Commissioner of Accounts approved the 1,475.97 on October 4, 1993, at Book 480 page 1768:

"Payable to the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell ...................$ 1,475.97" 

The issue is not the amount. The issue is that it entangles the Trust accounting with the Estste accounting. . Small numbers are used to make them appear unworthy of investigation, as if the issue were the amount.

The CPA Joanne Barnes created it (1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97). The attorney Edward White framed me with it:

"2. The K-1 filed by the Trust showed a payment of $816.00 in interest to the estate. You sent a check in the amount of $1475.97 to the estate. What was the remaining $659.97? Do I have this confused with the tax debt/credit situation which ran from the Third Accounting?"
(Attorney Edward White to Trustee, Anthony O'Connell, May 19, 1992)

If you can recognize the dynamics in this simple plant of confusion and conflict, you can recognize the same dynamics in others. For example, having Jean Nader make her reimbursement check out to "Fairfax County" when it is for the reimbursement to me plants confusion and conflict in the accounting. See item 14. http://www.659trail.com



This Complaint says, in so many words, that I should be removed as Trustee for trying to expose the accounting.

This Complaint says, in so many words, that I should be removed as Trustee for trying to expose the accounting.

The accountants and their collaborators make money disappear. They want me out because I try to stop them. I try to expose their accounting. They want Jean Nader in because she would not try to stop them. She would not try to expose their accounting. They use her as an unwitting cover.

I can not stop them from removing me as Trustee because I try to expose their accounting. I cannot stop them from instaling Jean Nader because she would not try to expose their accounting.


31. Anthony's repeated and unsuccessful challenges to the rulings of the Commissioner of Accounts and the Circuit Court in connection with the Eleventh Account, and his persistence in pursuing his unfounded claims to the present day, demonstrate that he is unable to administer the Harold Trust effectively and reliably.

Bottom line: The accountants and their collaborators make money disappear. They want me out because I try to expose their accounting. They want my sister Jean Nader in because she does not try to expose the accounting. They use her as unwitting cover.

(Just use 2 pages here - bk467p192 + complaint page 7

(Put images below ourside)

32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.

Bottom line: The accountants and their collaborators make money disappear. They want me out because I try to expose their accounting. They want my sister Jean Nader in because she does not try to expose the accounting. They use her as unwitting cover.


33. The removal of Anthony as trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust.


WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:
A. That the Court remove Anthony Minor O'Connell as trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, pursuant to § 55-547.06 of the Code of Virginia (1 950, as amended); 
B.That all costs incurred by Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Comell Nader in this action including reasonable attorneys' fees, be awarded to her in accordance with § 55- 550.04 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and
C. For all such further relief as this Court deems reasonable and proper


Count 111: Appointment of Successor Trustee

This is against the law. For example, the Trust Agreement is not a document that transfer's ownership. The Trust Deed is the document that transfers ownership. Why is the Trust Deed ignored? This rendered me powerlesless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money.

To see if Chief Judge Smith illegally took away my livelihood, my Trusteeship for the Trust property and my farm for my trying to expose the accounting at bk467p191, try exposing the accounting at bk467p191.

Bottom line: The accountants and their collaborators make money disappear. They want me out because I try to expose their accounting. They want my sister Jean Nader in because she does not try to expose the accounting. They use her as unwitting cover.

34. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 33 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
35. Jean is a proper person to serve as trustee of the Land Trust in order to sell the Property on behalf of the beneficiaries of the Land Trust, and she is willing and able to serve in such capacity.
36. The best interests of the beneficiaries would be served if the Land Trust is continued for a sufficient period of time to allow the successor trustee to sell the Property, rather than allowing the Land Trust to terminate on the date specified in the Land Trust Agreement. Each of the individual beneficiaries of the Land Trust is age 70 or above, and it would be prudent to sell the Property during their lifetimes, if possible, rather than leaving the matter for the next generation to resolve.
37. Jean is a proper person to serve as trustee of the trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, and she is willing and able to serve in such capacity.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:
A. That Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader be appointed as successor trustee under the aforesaid Land Trust Agreement, with the direction to sell the Property upon such terms and conditions as this Court deems reasonable and appropriate, including, but not limited to, fixing a reasonable amount as compensation of the successor trustee for her services;
B. That the term of the Land Trust be continued for a reasonable time in order to allow for the sale of the Property;
C. That Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader be appointed as successor trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell for all purposes, including distribution of the net proceeds of the sale of the Property that are payable to such trust;
D. That all costs incurred by Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader in this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees, be paid by the Land Trust; and
E. For all such further relief as this Court deems reasonable and proper. "

**********************************************************

 

Temporary organizing:

Put link to deed on every one? on evertone with a deed.

1-9 - deed as it were not there

10 - deed mentioned, but as if it were of no significance

11 - deed as it were not there
12- deed as it were not there

13- taxes, describes paragraph 9.03 in Agreement (See where it says I should not be reimbursed)

14- Payable to Fairfax County. Use crop and text of 659

15- deed- hodgepodge. But deed is best response.

16- Lynch title committe - use Schedule B

17- "only effort" Use "Please judge for yourself"

18- "Anthony has failed to pay the real estate taxes (I think I am responsable) .." Use "Ignored deed http://www.bookk8307page1446deed.com"

19- deed - personally did not pay tax - use my July 14, 2012, email

20- Exhibit D - *take farm,11 pages. *may 10-11

21- "In May 2012" Jean help me. Use phrase "The signature cover ..."

22- The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 21 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.

23- ambiguous, breach contract
24 - ambiguous, breach contract

25 -

A - Remove me as Trustee

B -."That all fees payable to Anthony Minor O'Connell under the terms of the aforesaid Land Trust Agreement, including but not limited to, the trustee's compensation under paragraph 9.01, and all interest on advancements by the trustee to the trust for payment of real estate taxes pursuant to paragraph 9.03, be disallowed and deemed forfeited;"
(put copy of this this under item 13 where it paraphraes paragraph 9.03 of the Agreement.)

C - Costs to jean nader be payed by the land trust

D - "For all such further relief as this Court deems reasonable and proper."

26- "The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 25 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein."

27- The terms of the Harold Trust provide that, upon the death of Mrs. O'Connell, the assets are to be distributed to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony in equal shares. Notwithstanding the terms of the Harold Trust and the provisions for its termination, Anthony entered into the Land Trust Agreement in his capacity as trustee of the Harold Trust. As a result, upon the sale of the Property, Anthony can exercise greater control over the Harold Trust's share of the sale proceeds than if the parties held their beneficial interests in their individual capacities.

28- Other than its status as beneficiary of the Land Trust, there is no reason for the continuation of the Harold Trust.

29- 659 - 11th account
30- 659 - ruling
31- 659 - challenge

32- "net proceeds ..."

33- remove me

34- The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 33 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.

35- jean best

36- best interests of beneficiaes

37- Jean best

 

Why is this accounting fraud protected instead of the public? My Trusteeship was sabotaged by those in control from day one by them ignoring the Trust Deed. Not recognizing my Trust Deed, but not actually saying so, and not saying why it should not be recognized, but just ignoring it, rendered me powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property, which forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The sabotage consequences are made to appear as my fault. As if there were no Trust Deed to be ignored. The consequences of not selling the trust property and not paying the real estate taxes after I ran out of money are used to justify removing me as Trustee. The reader has to recognize this set up. This cause and effect. If the reader does not follow this, this is a good place to stop. Does the FBI and the DOJ recognize this set up? History suggests I will be killed and it made to appear as my fault unless a just power removes the secrecy and enforces the law. . . . . . . . . . . .Try to expose http://book467page191money.com and see what happens. Try to get the establishment to recognize this Deed or say why it should not be recognized http://www.book8307page1446deed.com . Try to get a just power to flush out this Complaint http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/complaint/complaint-home.html and enforce contract law.