Anthony OConnell

2006

2006.04.04   (Anthony O'Connell to Jean Nader and Sheila O'Connell)
"Fairfax County's assessed value of Accotink as of January 1, 2006, is $980,000.00.
Conditions continue to exist that make it imprudent for me to enter into a sale contract for Accotink. I believe the probability of my sale of Accotink being taken over by people who control the audit trails and make money disappear, and using Jean as an unwitting front to do it, is approximately 100%.
The take over tools are in place. Unless these conditions can be changed none of us is going to get the proceeds of Accotink. After my death my Trusteeship of Accotink will be transferred to someone who is aware of these conditions. I have tried to get help from within and without the system but it has not worked.
I have had my credibility attacked until my credibility with you has been destroyed. If you look at the correspondence, it will show that the attacks come when I try to expose the audit trails. Audit trails remain secret and we are a destabilized family.
We have to communicate. I have to know who is telling who to do what. Secrecy is an impossible obstacle to overcome. Would you please give me your response to the following?
a) How do you feel that you have not received your money from Accotink?
b) Why do you think I have not entered into a sales contact for Accotink since 1992?
c) Please describe your understanding of my last sale as best you can. If you don't understand what happened in my past sale, how can you understand what is set up to happen in my future sale? If it can't be found where the money went in the takeover of my past sale, what chance is there in a takeover of my future sale of Accotink?
I believe it is fair to say that after thirteen years you are not going to believe me. Please try to expose the audit trails in mother's estate and find out for yourselves. The evidence is in exposing the audit trails, all the audit trails, and nothing but the audit trails. The only solution is in trying to expose the audit trails in mother's estate.
Audit trails have a beginning and an end. They consist of numbers and not words, numbers that logically follow one after the other, from the beginning to the end. If there are gaps or confusion, something is wrong. Every number in accounting has an audit trail.
Every number in the accounting in the court records has an audit trail.
The audit trails in the public court records are not meant to be secret. That is why they are made public. Copies of relevant public court records are enclosed. These are the accounts of the Estate, (inventory in Book 0457 page 0820, first account in Will Book 0467 page 0191, and the second account); and the 1991 account of the Trust, (Book 480 pagel765), prepared by the CPA Firm. I have no control over the CPA Firm who prepared the 1991
Trust Accounts even though I am the Trustee. I have no control over the people who control the audit trails.
A cover for money disappearing is confusing audit trails. People assume that it is their fault when they don't understand audit trails, rather than that the audit trails have been intentionally confused. It is human nature. Confusion is a cover. Confusion stops people from pursuing audit trails. Confusion is a red flag. It is virtual impossible to clear away the confusion. Start with the audit trails because only then can you see through the confusion. Do not accept confusion as an answer.
A cover for money disappearing is creating family conflict. It makes people think the problem is a family issue rather then money disappearing. The appearance of family conflict diverts people from exposing audit trails. Years of conflicts have been put upon us by the people who control the audit trails.
A cover for money disappearing is fear. An example is the lawyer's letter of April 22, 1992, in the Trust's 12th Court Account. It plans dirty tricks accounting to destabilize a family, take over their assets, and make money disappear. Your trust is the only tool they need. Jean would have to do a complete reversal from following the policy of secrecy she has been told to carry out in order to expose the audit trails in mother's estate. This may be an impossible obstacle for Jean to overcome because the last thing the people who control the audit trails will allow to happen is to have their audit trails exposed here. If
Jean does not overcome this obstacle of fear induced secrecy none of us is going to get our money from Accotink.
The simplest example that I can find that shows how things work, is audit trail 1,475.97 -
816.00 = 659.97. Use it as a straight arrow to cut through confusion. If you understand this audit trail you will understand a great deal. One is that the people who created this audit trail won't recognize it, or any audit trail, with 659.97 in it. Please try to figure out why. Then think carefully about whose advice you should rely upon.
From the 1991 Trust Account prepared by the CPA Firm, Book 0480 page 1768, approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, on October 4, 1993:
Payable to the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell ... $1,475.97
From the First Estate Account, Will Book 0467 page 0192, approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, on March 20, 1993:
Int fm Harold 'Connell Trust                                 816.00
Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust                           659.97
It is probable that neither of you will have the time or whatever to make yourself aware of the level of deception that has been put upon us. You can hire outside professionals but you still have to learn enough to know when you are being misled.
What does it mean when the lawyer for the Estate, the CPA Firm, and the Commissioner of Accounts don't recognize the audit trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97, or any audit trail with 659.97in it? Or any audit trails for the accounting conflicts the lawyer asks me about in his letter of May 19, 1992? Do you think it is a good idea, Jean and Sheila, to continue to go to them for advice? We have had thirteen years of secrecy. Secrecy works for the people who control the audit trails and make money disappear. Secrecy does not work for the family.
I will continue to try to find a buyer for Accotink who could be made aware of the existing conditions and not fall for them, but the probability of finding a buyer like this, is as remote now, as it has been in the past.
Sheila, you owe me your share of real estate taxes for 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004, and 2005. Jean, you owe me your share of real estate taxes for 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005. Please make your check payable to "Anthony O'Connell, Trustee". If you decide you want to reimburse me
I will calculate the amounts. If you do reimburse me it would stop the accumulation of the 10% interest on your unpaid balance.
You do not believe what I have been telling you all these years. Please try to expose the audit trails in mother's estate and find out for yourself so I can sell Accotink. Expose the audit trails. Then judge. It is the only solution.
Love, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee
Enclosures (14)" DID I REALLY INCLUDE 14 ENCLOSURES HERE? OR JUST THE THREE?
(Editing note: Please see the reference in pdf to see the 14 enclosures that are not included here)

 

2006.11.10   8:41am   (Anthony O'Connell to Kevin Greenlief)
"Would you please update your records for tax map 0904 01 001 7 to reflect my new address?
Old address:  Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee  45 Skyview Road Sedona. Arizona 86336
New address: Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee 856 Country Club Drive Prescott, Arizona 86303-4061
Thank you."

 

2006.11.14   7:59pm    (Anthony O'Connell to Bill Lynch)
"Nice to hear from you, how are you and your family?
I would like to sell Accotink.  The seller on any future contract or deed for Parcell 0904 01 0017 is Anthony M. O'Connell , Trustee, and no other.
I moved from Sedona to Prescott, Arizona.  This is my new address.
Anthony M. O'Connell , Trustee
856 Country Club Drive
Prescott, Arizona 86303-4061
aoconnell@cableone.net
Tony"

2007