B&K choice
(This is the html version of pdf file "b&k-choice12p")


(page 1, title page)
B&K
The law firm of Blankingship and Keith in Fairfax County

 

(page 2)
Timeline
The more I try to expose the accounting trails of the CPA Joanne White and the Attorney Edward White, the more I’m shut out, and I’ve tried for twenty years.
After I posted my website http://www.canweconnectthedots.com on March 31, 2012, to try to expose their accounting trails at bk467p191, my power of attorney for selling the Trust property was revoked, I was sent a Summons, an Injunction, a Notice to appear in Court, and an Order to appear in Court.
If there is any doubt that the accountant’s signature pattern is to use a trusting family member as cover, vetting these events should remove it.
Perhaps it's all a coincidence, but the following happened to me after I tried to expose bk467p191 by posting my website http://www.canweconnectthedots.com on March 31, 2012:

1992.10.16 Trust created.
1993.03.20 Accounting at Book467page191 approved by Commissioner Jesse Wilson III
(The accounting trails remain concealed)

2012.03.31  Trustee posts http://www.canweconnectthedots.com to try to expose bk467p191.
2012.05.10  Trustee's VA poverty pension application disappears in confusion.
2012.05.11  Trustee sent lien for $27,699.
2012.05.25  Trustee's Power of Attorney for Trust property revoked. (Use Jean Nader)
2012.09.04  Trustee sent Summon.  (Use Jean Nader)
2012.09.28  Trustee sent Injunction.  (Use Jean Nader)
2012.10.22  Trustee sent Notice to appear in Court. (Use Jean Nader)
2012.11.21  Trustee asks Judges about Notice. (Use Jean Nader)
2012.11.27  Judge Smith to Trustee: judgesmith2p (Use Jean Nader)
2012.12.05  Trustee sent Court Order. (Use Jean Nader)
2013.07.03  B&K law firm letter says Jean Nader has replaced Anthony O'Connell as Trustee:  b&k3p * (Use Jean Nader)
2013.10.23  I notice that a B&K attorney is apparently "in care of" trust property.  (Use Jean Nader)
2014.01.09  DTA Director emails Trustee with an attached Order dated October 5, 2012. **
  *I have never received anything from the Court saying I was no longer Trustee.
**I had not seen the attached Order dated October 5, 2012, before. It says I am not to sell the trust property.

 

(page 3)
Gmail - Your letters of May 25, 2012, and May 31, 2012
Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnelI@gmail.com>    Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:44 PM
To: "Sarah E. Hall" <shall@bklawva.com>
Cc: Sheila OConnell <sheilamail4@gmail.com, Amy Johnson <natron36@hotmail.com>, Jean Nader
<jeansfinedining@hotmail.com>, Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnelI@gmail.com> "James E. Tierney"
<moulinavent@maine.rr.com>, Tammy Tierney <fins2theleft@maine.rr.com>, Pierre Shevenell
<pierreshevenell@yahoo.com>
Ms. Sarah Hall, of the law firm of Blankingship and Keith,
I apologize for the delay in responding to your letters of May 25, 2012, and May 31, 2012; 1 had a medical
problem Thank you for your email address.
Please look at my websites http://www.alexandriavirginra15acres.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com and decide whether you want B&K to support the accountants or the law. If the accounting at Bk467p191 in the public record were exposed, it would show that our sister Jean Nader is being used by the accountant's to make money disappear, and that there is no end in sight. Our family is innocent no matte ,how much the accountants make it appear otherwise. Can B&K enforce the law and have the accounting tralls behind Bk467p191 actually be exposed? Would you please explain to Jean Nader some of the ways we have beenset up?
I saw the only possible way to sell Accotink without our famlly being put through another round of confllct and confusion and have our money disappear behind it, was to not pay the real estate taxes on Accotink so Accotink would be sold for back taxes; but someone paid enough of the taxes to stop that.
Anthony O'Connell, Trustee

(Comment: I thought it unnecessary to mention that I had run out of money paying the real estate for all three beneficiaries because the Director of DTA was not not recognizing the Trust Deed and would not say why. It would not be prudent to try to see the Trust property when the Trust Deed is not recognized and no reason is given)

(page 4)
Gmail - Accotink, http://www.alexandriavirginial5acres.com
Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnelI@gmail>    Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 6:44 PM
To: "Sarah E. Hall" <shall@bklawva.com>
Cc: Sheila OConnell <sheilamail4@gmail.com>, Amy Johnson <natron36@hotmail.com>, Jean Nader
<jeansfinedining@hotmail.com>, Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnelI@gmail.com>, "James E. Tierney"
<moulinavent@maine.rr.com>, Tammy Tierney <fins2theleft@maine.rr.com>, Pierre Shevenell
<pierreshevenell@yahoo.com>
Dear Sarah E. Hall,
I am very impressed that you provide your email address; it provides
transparency and accountability. It's been my experience that it is
seldom done. I am also impressed by your background (http.//www. blanking/andkeith.com/bk.cgim?template=attorney&employee_i4d =l4)
The three beneficiares of the Virginia Land Trust for Accotink, Jean
Nader, Sheila O'Connell, and Anthony O'Connell, are, or are about, 70,
72, and 74 years old, and we are all in poor health. It is probable
that the proceeds of Accotink would go to the next generation, and
that is the reason I sent copies of my email to you of July 14, to
those of that generation that I have email addresses for:
Sheila OConnell <sheilamail4@gmai1.com>, beneficiary
Amy Johnson <natron36@hotrmail.com>, daughter of Jean Nader
Jean Nader <jeansfinedining@hotmail.com> beneficiary
Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnell@gmail corn>, beneficiary and trustee
James E. Tierney" <moulinavent@maine.rr.com>, son of Sheila O'Connell
Tammy Tierney <flns2theleft@maine.rr.com>, daughter in law of Sheila O'Connell
Pierre Shevenell <pierresl.shevenell@yahoo.com> husband of Sheila O'Connell
Thank you.
Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee for Accotink,
http://www.alexandriavirginial5acres.com

 

(page 5)
Gmail - Accotink and bk467pl91
Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnelI@gmail.com>    Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:23 AM
To: "Sarah E. Hall" <shall@bklawva.com>
Cc: Amy Johnson <natron36@hotmail.com>, Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnelI@gmail.com>,"James E.
Tierney" <moulinavent@maine.rr.com>, Jean Nader <jeansfinedining@hotmail.com>, Pierre Shevenell
,<pierreshevenell@yahoo.com>, richard patnaude <richard.patnaude@optum.com>, Sheila OConnell
<sheilamail4@gmail.com>, Tammy Tierney <fins2theleft@maine.rr.com>, Andrew O'Connell-Shevenell
<aoconnellshevenell@gmail.com>
Dear Sarah E. Hall,
I wonder if you wonder whether Jean Nader might have intentionally mislead you into believing that I have done
little to try to sell Accotink, when it has become obvious that that is not true. Jean Nader would not intentionally
mislead you; she trusts what the accountant's tell her to a degree that is beyond believing
. She will do what the
accountants tell her to do. I believe you would be astounded. She is innocent.

If your staff studied http://www.canweconnectthedots.com , would they see that the accountants manipulated our
mother into putting Jean in control? Putting Accotink in the control of Jean Nader is putting Accotink in the control
of the accountants.
I pray that you would use your power and prestige, and most of all your willingness to be transparent and
accountable, to ask B&K to try to expose Bk467p191. The path to exposure would show most all that is needed. If
this is not possible in the situation that we find ourselves in now, I don't believe it ever will be exposed. B&K would
be giving the real estate industry of Virginia, the legal profession of Virginia, and the people of the country a huge
gift.

Example

7987.12.24 (From the 1987 sales contract I negotiated with Lynch Properties)
"PURCHASE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEWIEIVT is made and entered into this 24th day of December l987, by and between JEAN MINER,
ANTHONY M. O'Connell, TRUSTEE and HERBERT A. HIGHAM, TRUSTEE ("Seller") and LYNCH PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia limited partnership, or assigns ("Purchaser"). The Seller and the Purchaser are sometimes hereinafter referred to as the "parties". - - -
(I can't convince our family my that this means that the "Seller" is a single legal entity; that someone would
represent all or none of the grantors comprising the single legal entity of "Seller", and that the "Seller" can not be
divided unless all parties to the contract agree to it.)
Section 11. Notices. (From the 1987 sales contract I negotiated with Lynch Properties, same document as the
above)
All notices or communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed
duly given if in writing and delivered personally, or sent by registered or certified United States mail, return receipt
requested, first class, postage prepaid, to the following addresses, (or such other addresses as may be designated
in writing):
(a) if to the Seller:
(page 6)
Anthony M. O'Connell, Trustee
2337 S. 13th Street
St. Louis, Mo. 63104
and
(b) with a copy to:
dean Miner O'Connell
6541 Franconia Road
Springfield, Va. 22150
(I can't convince our family my that this section means what it says; that I am the point of contact for the single
legal entity of "Seller").

Takeover

1991.03.15 (Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, copy to Jean O'Connell, in part)
"In regard to your inquiry as to why, in 1988, there came a time when I refused to deal with you on the sale, 7
as I said, I recalled that a conceivably adverse relationship had developed between you and your mother
concerning the sale.
(I can't convince my sister that Edward White's " .. I refused to deal with you on the sale ..." is against contract law.)

$125,188 disappears, see bk467p191
(April 2l, 1992, payment from my sale)

"2. My copy [Jean O'Connell's 1991 IRS Form 1040] also does not show the principal of $125,188.17 paid to my
mother by the Lynch Note in April of 1991. It does show the interest. With a gross profit percentage of .79 on
the installment sale, about $98,898.65 of the $125,188.17 should have been reported on line 13 of the 1040
as a capital gain. It appears that this omission is up and above the penalties and interest already acknowledged.
Why was it not reported? Will you amend the return?"
(1992.05.29 Anthony O'Connell to Edward White, in part.)

!'With regard to the income tax matter and the capital gain from the receipt of principal on the Lynch note in Aprll
1991, 1 was following the 1990 return and simply did not pick up the fact that there was a principal payment in
1991. 1 will most certainly pay any interest and penalty which might accrue in this regard, and sincerely appreciate
your calling it to my attention."
(1992.06.11 Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, in part.)

$545,820 disappears, see bk467p191
(April 21 ,I 992, payment from my sale)

"The Lynch note will not produce any capital gain since it was taxed in the estate as part of your mother's
assets."
'(1992.11.13 Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, Jean Nader, and Sheila O'Connell, in part.)
"The Lynch Note to the estate, a result of the installment sale of my mother's residence on 4/21/88, carries with it a
taxable capital gain. The IRS requires that this capital gains tax be paid by the estate or the beneficiaries if the
taxable capital gain is passed through the estate to the beneficiaries before the end of the tax year.
The gross profit percentage on the sale was seventy-nine percent (79%). The payoff of the Lynch note to the
estate on 4/21/92 was $545,820.42 of which $45,067.74 was income and $500,752.68 was capital. Of that
$500,752.68 in capital, 79% or $395,594.62 is taxable capital gain."
(1992.11.16 Anthony O'Connell to Edward White, in part.)
(page 7)
"Regretfully I have to amend my letter of Friday. There is no "stepped up basis" on the Lynch note
according to the accountants who are preparing the fiduciary income tax return."
(1992.1 1 .I6 Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, Jean Nader, and Sheila O'Connell, in part)
"As far as an income prediction for the Estate is concerned, I can make no intelligent prediction since I do not know
how long it will remain open. I have been continuously burned in making gratuitous comments about the tax liability
of the heirs, and counsel and other attorney friends have stated to me, that given the performance of Mr. O'Connell,
that I should make no comment at all. I tried to be helpful, but that did not work. I can only say that had I not been
adamant about re-valuing the Accotink property, Mr. O'Connell's initial approach would have cost this estate dearly.
From the comments in his recent demands for "information", I can see that he is jumping to conclusions based on
no knowledge at all. I will not reply directly to him on any future aspect of this estate. As a matter of fact I am
precluded as an attorney from dealing with an adverse party who is represented by counsel. I have no intentions of
having him dictate the duties of the fiduciaries. If his counsel wishes to discuss anything, I am certainly available."
(1993.02.02 Edward White to trusting family member Jean Nader, in part)
(This is what my family has been led to believe and they will never get beyond this unless a just power steps in.
My attempts to expose bk467p191 are considered a hostile act)

Accotink

No matter how clean a sales contract I could get for Accotink, does it look as if the accountants can takeover and
justify it with a "I recalled that a conceivably adverse relationship had developed between you and your mother
[family member] concerning the sale."? Would it be prudent to enter into a sales contract for Accotink under the
bresent conditions?
Reference:
http://www.alexandriavirginial5acres.com
http://www.canweconnectthedots.com


Gmail - Response
Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnelI@gmail.com>    Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:39 PM
To: "Sarah E. Hall" <shalt@bklawva.com>
Dear Sarah E. Hall,
Are you going to respond to my messages to you?
Thank you
Anthony O'Connell, Trustee
References:
http://www.alexandriavirginial5acres.corn
http://www. canweconnectthedots.com



Sarah Hall <shall@bklawva.com>    Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:20 PM
To: Anthony OConnell ~anthonymineroconnelI@gmail.com~
Mr. O'Connell:
Wed, Jut 25, 2012 at 2:20 PM
While we had earlier received formal confirnmation of your receipt of my letter of May 25, 2012, it was good to
hear directly from you that you had received it.
In your emails you rriention a number of issues regarding the respective estates arid trusts of your parents and
the title to the proprty in the 1992 Land Trust, and you provided a link to a websitc on which you raise more
,questions. We believe these issues were rnooted some time ago by findings of the Cornmissioner of Accounts
and the Circuit Court of Fairfax County.
We were sorry to hear of your recent illness. In light of your ill health and tlie great distance that you live
from the Virginia property, it would seen1 appropriate - and certainly understandable - .for you to resign as
Trustee of the I992 Land Trust.
Best regards,
Sarah Hall


(page 9)
Gmall - Please send me another copy of you last letter
Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnell@gmail.com>     Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 7:34 PM
To: "Sarah E. Hall" <shall@bklawva.com>
Cc: Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnell@gmail.com>
Dear Sarah E. Hall, Attorney, Blankingship & Keith
I lost your last letter from about a week ago, the one that says I should resign as Trustee of Accotink. Would you
please send me another copy?
Thank you.
Anthony O'Connell, Trustee

(page 10)
Gmail - Accotink, parcel 0904 01 0017 and your letter of July 3, 2013 4/16/14 1:44 PM
Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnell@gmail.com>     Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:21 PM
To: Sarah Hall <shall@bklawva.com>
Dear Sarah Hall:
Your letter of July 3, 2013, says, in part: "This firm is representing your sister Jean O'Connell Nader in her capacity as
Successor Trustee under the Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992". Please send me copies of the Court documents that would show how this would be true.
Please correct me if I am wrong but your letter also says that our sister Jean Nader has signed a letter of intent and a
sales contract. Please send me copies of these documents.
Sincerely,
Anthony O'Connell, Trustee


Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnell@gmail.com>     Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:16 PM
To: "Sarah E. Hall, law firm of Blankingship and Keith" <shall@bklawva.com>
Cc: Amy Johnson <natron36@hotmail.com>, Sheila OConnell <sheilamail4@gmail.com>, Pierre Shevenell
<pierreshevenell@yahoo.com>, Kate Simmons ksimmons92270 <ksimmons92270@yahoo.com>
Dear Sarah Hall:
Your letter of July 3, 2013, says, in part: "This firm is representing your sister Jean O'Connell Nader in her capacity as
Successor Trustee under the Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992". Please send me copies of the Court documents that would show how this would be true.
Please correct me if I am wrong but your letter also says that our sister Jean Nader has signed a letter of intent and a
sales contract. Please send me copies of these documents.
Sincerely,
Anthony O'Connell, Trustee
(My emails to Jean Nader at jeansfinedining@hotmail.com bounce so I ask her daughter Amy Johnson who lives near
to deliver this message to Jean Nader)


Sarah Hall <shall@bklawva.com>     Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:21 AM
To: Anthony O'Connell <anthonymineroconnell@gmail.com>
Mr. O'Connell:
We will send you copies of the documents you request. Please confirm that your address is 439 S. Vista Del
Rio, Green Valley, Arizona 85614.
(page 11)
Thank you.
Sarah Hall


Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnell@gmail.com>     Wed Apr 16, 2014 at 12:18 PM
To: Sarah Hall <shall@bklawva.com>
Dear Sarah Hall,
Yes, my address is:
439 S. Vista Del Rio, Green Valley, Arizona 85614.
Thank you
Anthony O'Connell


Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnell@gmail.com>     Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:43 PM
To: Sarah Hall <shall@bklawva.com>
Dear Sarah Hall,
Would you please send me the documents as email attachments? That way there is no misunderstanding of
what was sent and it is quicker.
Thank you.
Anthony O'Connell


(page 12)
Gmail - 1992 deed ati bk8307p1446. Please send the documents I requested, and any related, documents, by email attachment.
Anthony OConnell <anthonymineroconnell@gmail.com>     Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:55 PM
To: "Sarah E. Hall, law firm of Blankingship and Keith" <shall@bklawva.com>
Cc: Jean Nader % Amy Nader Johnson <natron36@hotmail.com>, Sheila OConnell <sheilamaiI4@gmail.com>, Pierre
Shevenell <pierreshevenell@yahoo.com>, Kate Simmons ksimmons92270 <ksimmons92270@yahoo.com>
Dear Sarah Hall:
Please send me the documents I requested, and any related documents, by email attachment. That way there should
be no misunderstanding of what was sent.
Do you know why the Buyer (Edwin W. Lynch, Jr., and Andy Somerville(?)) will not communicate with me? Do you
know why my sisters Jean Nader and Sheila O'Connell will not communicate with me? Why the secrecy?
Why does the Buyer apparently believe that your client Jean Nader has the legal capacity to contract for the 1992 trust property? Why does B&K believe it?
Please show the document trail from the 1992 deed at bk8307p1446 to where Jean Nader would become "Successor
Trustee" with the legal capacity to contract.
Does B&K recognize the 1992 deed at bk8307p1446? Please give a "yes" or a "no". If "no", please explain why.
Thank you.
Anthony O'Connell, Trustee until proven otherwise