This accounting fraud is protected. The public is not. The fraudster's signature cover is to divide and conquer the family they victimize. The public needs a free press to show how they work. To expose accounting fraud, expose the accounting.

 

Public

Suggestion - This is so unfinished don't even try to read it.
The public needs the free press to show the patterns
(Under construction)

The public has no chance against this accounting fraud.
They are protected. The public is not.
We need the free press to show the patterns.

Believe it or not, the only protection the public has is for every member of the family to learn to recognize the fraud patterns before it's too late. In twenty-five years not one person has attempted to stop them from using our innocent sister or has attempted to expose their accounting. Their signature cover is to use a trusting family member to unwitting carry out their agenda of dividing, destabilizing, and disempowering, the family they victimize. They take control of a family's assets by attacking the family fiduciaries and supplanting them.

There is nothing you can do to stop them if one member of your family trusts them. They are ruthless. They are above the law. The most difficult barrier for me in recognizing the patterns is to overcome the "Oh-no-they-wouldn't-do-that-much-less-get-away-with-it mindset. They will do that and they will get away with it. Going right for the jugular under the guise of a fiduciary relationship appears to be the perfect cover. All they need is your trust

I've lost most everything for trying to expose their accounting. After thirty-one years I believe it is fair to say the government will continue to protect them and not the public. If a just power does not stop them from using our innocent sister (Last known address: Jean O'Connell Nader, 444 Summit Street, New Kensington, Pennsylvania, 15068 Telephone 724 337-7537) to unwittingly carryout their agenda, they will continue to use her against me to protect themselves until it kills me.

We need the news media to expose how it works. The only reason I can think of for the media to not tell the public is the same reason the media hesitated to print the pentagon papers; that they would be sued for libel. I pray the press would not self censor. I believe Emile Zola's newspaper article "J'accuse" (I accuse) defending Alfred Dreyfus, made him an enemy of the State and he was sentenced to a year in prison.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyfus_affair


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%27accuse%E2%80%A6!
Whistle blower

JMO/JON    AMO

The walls of secrecy are impenetrable.
JMO - Jean Miner O'Connell, Mother
JON - Jean O'Connell Nader, daughter
AMO - Anthony Miner O'Connell, son

Secrecy is essential to the fraudsters and fatal to the family. If the family rejects the culture of secrecy the fraudsters will go away. Those who don't want the accounting exposed want me out because I have experience in accounting and try to expose the fraudsters. They want our sister Jean Nader in because they can use her to unwittingly carry out their agenda and she will not try to expose their accounting. It is necessary to differentiate between what the fraudsters and their collaborators say and what the accounting trails say. They take control of a family's assets by attacking the family fiduciaries and supplanting them. All they need is your trust.

 

1985
1

(above) If Commissioner of Accounts Robert J. McClandish, Jr.. had not told our Mother and I that the testamentary trust described in our Father's Will had to be funded we would never have known. Our Father died in 1975 and his Will was probated in 1976. I believe our Mother's CPA Joanne Barnes, had been doing the accounting since 1976. I wonder how his Will could be probated without the Testamentary Trust being recognized and addressed. Was it for the same reasons that my 1992 Deed as Trustee is being ignored?  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com/deed-webs/deed-webs-home.html  

2

Hook home

(above) SAVE    RE Est of HAOC    45,325.00
In answer to your letter of May 8, 1985 reguarding progress in establishing a trust required by the will with Anthony O'Connell as Trustee I would like to report that a co-trustee has agreeded to serve with him. Ms Jo Ann Barnes
Home address
7225 Pine Dr.
Annandale, VA 22003
354 - 0673
549-7800 -office
She will be working on this very soon with a lawyer.    I had hoped that the procedure of setting up the trust could be simplified by putting title to the resident estate (my home) in the names of my three children - the same as listed in the will to receive it to receive it.
There should be more definite progress soon and I will inform your office then
VTY
JMO'C Extrx
Sent 5/31/85
To Commissioner of Accounts
Sent 5/31/85

Hook homeplace and family

Our Mother's "I had hoped that the procedure of setting up the trust could be simplified by putting title to the resident estate (my home) in the names of my three children - the same as listed in the will to to receive it." is a huge hook. History suggests the CPA and lawyer advised her to do this. The lawyer's name is not mentioned. This suggests that she has been instructed to keep his name a secret. If I had known a lawyer was already onboard I would not have hired an attorney.

Mixing the Testamentary trust, our homeplace, and the three beneficiaries, would create a huge entanglement. Whoever controls the entanglements or hooks controls the people and assets that are entangled or hooked.



3

Lawyer fix memos



The public should know that the fraudsters and their colaborators will covertly have a member of your family come into to the Court and do something that effects you and won't tell you what it is.

It's been more than 32 years now and whatever the lawyer fixed and had Jean O'Connell come into to the Court and do remains concealed. Was it to sign what the "lawyer fixed"? Was it something under the guise of a usual and customary document concerning a bond and/or non-resident fiduciaries, but the actual intent is to keep me away from the fraudsters accounting by blocking me from qualifying as Trustee? I have experience in accounting and try to expose their accounting.



4

First thing memo

"So Kaiser - Hilton
549-7800
Joanne,
My son Tony called.
He said he wanted very much to be the full trustee with an
agent to receive notices and processes from the
court and commissioner as in the May 8th letter.
Would
First thing is to have the final accounting
based on the same figures
as in the first accounting.
Send it to me - Do I have to sign it."  

"Call - Will do draft of final accting.-     
deed to property - convey to court.      
needs how much"  

Withholding what you need is a hook. In May(?) of 1985 our Mother instructed her CPA Joanne Barnes to send her the final accounting for our Dad's estate. About fourteen months later the lawyer Ed White tells our Mother "Ms Barnes will contact you at the time your signature is needed." Our family is made to appear responsible.

"First thing is to have the final accounting
based on the same figures
as in the first accounting.
Send it to me - Do I have to sign it."  

The CPA ignored Jean O'Connell's instructions. The CPA planted hooks:
"Call - Will do draft of final accting.-     
deed to property - convey to court.      
needs how much"  

On June 26, 1986, the lawyer tells our Mother:
"Ms Barnes will contact you at the time your signature is needed."

The 14 month delay is blamed on the family fiduciary who they supplant:
"If he does not agree or requests further delaying tactics, I feel I have no other recourse in serving my client, than to seek to have him removed as a Trustee. This matter is costing Mrs. O'Connell dearly with the delay."

This is not an intellectual experience. It is gut wrenching. It destroyed my relationship with my Mother. Our Mother died believing I was the problem. I believed she was the problem until I found her "First thing" memo in her papers after her death in 1991.

1992
5
Hostile takeover

They take control of a family's assets by attacking the family fiduciaries and supplanting them. All they need is your trust.
("If he does not agree or requests further delaying tactics, I feel that I have no other recourse in serving my client than to seek to have him removed as a Trustee.  This matter is costing Mrs. O'Connell dearly with the delay. Sincerely, Edward J. White") 

6
$518,903 disappears




Complete accounts 23p
Use innocent 18p

The signature cover is to use a trusting family member to unwittingly divide, destabilize, and disempower the family they victimize.

The CPA Joanne Barnes and the Attorney Edward White make money disappear and use our trusting sister as unwitting cover. A cash payment of $545,820.43 is made to our Mother's estate for the full premature payoff of the Lynch Note on April 21, 1992. But only the interest of $26,917.17 is reported. The difference of $518, 903.26 disappears. The only way to get to the truth is to follow the trails. You can always trust that 545,820.43 - $26,917.17 = $518,903.26. I ask attorney Edward White about the planned $545,820.43 payment.

On April 22, 1992, the day after the $545,820.43 payment, .Edward White gives Jean Nader covert instructions that will tear out family apart. He does not mention the $545,820.43 payment before.

1992.04.22   (Edward White to Jean Nader)
"Enclosed is an agreement which should satisfy Tony as to the car. It cannot be any clearer.
Also enclosed is a preliminary analysis of the estate tax, which should be close to being accurate. I do need to check with Jo Ann Barnes as to a technical question as to whether or not any of your father's trust comes into this. I do not think it does, but there have been many changes in the law since that trust was established. I will have to ask her to bill us for that advice and any other technical tax matters I am not comfortable with. I can do most of the rest of the tax work and save the estate some money.
The executors' commission shown on the analysis is not figured on the value of the realty; however it does not include the 5% commission on the receipts of the estate in addition to the inventory.
In order to file that return and the subsequent Fiduciary Income tax return we will need an accounting from Tony from the date of his last accounting to the date of death. If he does not want to prepare it, I will not agree to any preliminary disbursal to him at all, and will seek your approval to file suit against him to compel the accounting, plus damages to the estate for his delay. Since that trust terminated on your mother's death, his final accounting is due now and not in October.
There will be no further explanations or written entreaties to him as far as I am concerned. He has the duty and he will perform it under a court order if necessary. Of course he will furnish that receipt.
The preliminary analysis contains three alternatives on Accotink at the bottom for your consideration.
In the event that we do seek a reduction in the assessment Tony will be given written notice that his prompt cooperation is necessary and that if he fails to cooperate that he is aware of the adverse consequences to the estate and is responsible for them.
As far as further steps are concerned, we have a lot to do. No gift tax returns were filed for 1989 and 1991 which will have to be done. The results of those gifts are factored in under "Unified Credit used for gifts 9,784".
The paper trail in the court and IRS is as follows:
File Estate tax by June 15, 1992
File First Accounting (16 months after qualification but can be sooner)
Ask for posting of Debts and Demands against the estate.
File Fiduciary Income tax returns for period 9/15/91-9/15/92, due January 1, 1993.
File Motion for a Show Cause why distribution should not be made. Submit Show Cause Order.
Request Executor's exoneration letter from IRS and Virginia.
Obtain closing letter from IRS and Virginia as to estate tax returns.
File 1993 Fiduciary tax returns (Sept. 1992-distribution)
File for Order allowing distribution.
Distribute estate.
File Final Accounting.
Normally distribution is withheld until the Order of Distribution is entered. As I indicated the creditors have one year to press claims against the estate. No prudent executor will distribute before that period, the entry of the Order of Distribution and the receipt of the tax closing letters.
Sincerely, Edward J. White
EJW/e
Encl.

Comments:
a) These covert instructions were made the day after the $545,820.43 payment (Jean Nader is so innocent she sent me a copy of this letter, not understanding that I was not supposed to see it.) The payment is not mentioned. There are about nine major set ups in this letter. No family can survive this intact.
b) This covert letter to our sister, at the beginning of the administration of the estate, in 1992, under the guise of protecting the estate, in what is supposed to be a fiduciary relationship, urges my sister to take me to Court. It should not be a surprise, after 20 years of varying degrees of this agenda, that they got her to take me to Court in 2012 with the Complaint.

7
Hooks

1,475 - 816 = 659




Learn to recognize hooks

The pattern the fraudsters most don't want recognized is their planting of hooks. Who ever controls the hooks (the accountants) controls the people and assets that are hooked or entangled. Hooks render the family powerless.

Learn to recognize hooks. It is uncanny how well the simple 1,475 - 816 = 659 example illustrates the dynamics. One indicator of it's significance is the degree those in control go to make it appear insignificant. Small numbers are used to make them appear unworthy of attention. As if the issue were the amount. The issue is not the amount. The issue is that they entangle.

Withholding what you need is a hook. Withholding the final account for our Dad's estate is a hook. Ignoring my Deed as Trustee and never saying why is a hook. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money.

Frame you with their hook

"The K-1 filed by the Trust showed a payment of $816.00 in interest to the estate. You sent a check in the amount of $1475.97 to the estate. What was the remaining $659.97? Do I have this confused with the tax debt/credit situation which ran from the Third Accounting?" 
(From Edward White's letter to Anthony O'Connell, May 19, 1992)

The only why to recognize accounting fraud is to expose the accounting trails. It is necessary to differentiate between what people say and what the accounting trails say. Such as "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust ..... 659.97" and:

"Int fm Harold O'Connell Trust  ......................................... 816.00" (Estate accounting at bk467p192)
"Debt fm Harold O’Connell Trust ...................................... 659.97" (Estate accounting at bk467p192)
"Payable to the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell ... ... .... ... $ 1,475.97" (Trust accounting at bk480p1768)
(Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, approved these accounting trails. And then closed my Trust account against my intent after I recognized the 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 trail.



2000
8
Coverup by Report


August 8, 2000 -   (Jesse Wilson's Report to the Judges) 
"To the Honorable Judges of Said Court:
RE: Estate of Harold A. OConnell, Trust
Fiduciary No. 21840
1. By a Tenth Account duly filed herein and approved by the undersigned on August 25, 1995, the trustee herein, Anthony M. 0'Connell, properly accounted for all of the remaining assets reported as being assets of the trust created by the will of Harold OConnell and reported a zero balance on hand. A copy of said account is filed herewith as Exhibit 1.
2. By an Eleventh Account, Anthony M. OConnell, trustee, again reported zero assets on hand and no receipts or disbursements. A copy of said account is filed herewith as Exhibit 2.
3. Both the Tenth and Eleventh accounts carried the notation "This is not a final account".
4. In the ordinary case, an account which shows the distribution of all remaining assets is filed as a Final Account, and its approval terminates the fiduciary's responsibility to the Court and permits the Commissioner of Accounts to close the file.
5. The said trustee has also filed a Twelfth Account in which he reports as an asset $659.97 "due from the Estate of Jean M. OConnell".  A copy of that "account" is enclosed herewith as Exhibit 3.
6. The Estate of Jean M. OConnell, deceased, Fiduciary No. 49160, was closed in the Commissioner of Accounts office after approval of a Final Account on May 31, 1994.
7. The said $659.97 was the subject of correspondence between the said trustee and Edward J. White, attorney and co-executor of the estate of Jean M. OConnell, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits 4 and 5. In his letter,
Exhibit 5, the trustee explains that the $659.97 is part of a net income payment of $1,475.97 which the trust owed the estate of Jean M. OConnell. In that same letter, the trustee states that "At this point in time, I believe Mr. Balderson and I are of one mind that the estate does not owe the trust and the trust does not owe the estate".
Mr. Balderson was a CPA for the estate. Both of these letters were provided to the Commissioner of Accounts by the trustee in support of his "Twelfth Account".
8. The trustee also provided the Commissioner with a copy of a page from a "Jean M. OConnell estate tax analysis" which shows $659.97 under "Assets" of that estate as "Debt from Harold OConnell Trust".  A copy of that page is attached as Exhibits 6.
From a review of this information the Commissioner finds that there is no evidence to support an assertion by the trustee that the $659.97 is an asset of the trust. To the contrary, it appears that either it is not a debt at all, or, from the estate's point of view, it was money owed by the trust to the estate, i.e. an asset of the estate of Jean M. OConnell. That estate has been closed for more that six years.
Accordingly, the foregoing Eleventh Account of Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee has been marked a "Final Account" by the undersigned and is hereby approved as a Final Account in the trust under the will of Harold A. OConnell and is filed herewith.
In the event that the trustee is successful in recovering $659.97 or any other funds which are proper trust assets to be accounted for, such may be reported to the Commissioner of Accounts by an Amended Inventory and, thereafter, accounted for by proper accounts.

GIVEN under my hand this 8th day of August, 2000.
Respectfully submitted,
Jesse B. Wilson, III 
Commissioner of Accounts
Fairfax County, Virginia
JBW:jcs
Enc.: Exhibits, 1 - 6
cc: Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee"
(See the exhibits in the pdf reference)

Compare
12th actual 22p
12th report 20p

Background
To Judge, July 24, 2000
To Judges 121p
, July 24, 2000

Compare my actual 12th account to the description of it in the Report:
12th actual 22p
12th report 20p

Details
10th account 17p

11th account can't be approved, November 7, 1996 ("Please exlain why you are the only trustee.")
11th account, Trustee letter 1p, June 3, 1999
11th account revised 13p, June 12, 1999
11th made final by Commissioner 3p, August 8, 2000
11th account 22p, April 24, 1995, made final account, August 8, 2000 ???????????????
11th, related letters 3p
12th delinquent 8p
12th account 22p
13th delinquent 1p
13th draft 4p

Accounts 1st through 13th 257p

 

From Complaint

29. On August 8, 2000, an Eleventh Account for the Harold Trust was approved by the Commissioner of Accounts for the Circuit Court of Fairfax County and determined to be a final account.
30. Anthony repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged the Commissioner's determination and requested, inter alia, that the Court and the Commissioner of Accounts investigate a debt of $659.97 that he alleged was owed to the Harold Trust by Mrs. O'Connell's estate. In these proceedings, the Commissioner stated, and the court agreed, that there was no evidence to support Anthony's claims that a debt existed and, if so, that it was an asset of the Harold Trust.
31. Anthony's repeated and unsuccessful challenges to the rulings of the Commissioner of Accounts and the Circuit Court in connection with the Eleventh Account, and his persistence in pursuing his unfounded claims to the present day, demonstrate that he is unable to administer the Harold Trust effectively and reliably.
32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.
32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.
33. The removal of Anthony as trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:
A. That the Court remove Anthony Minor O'Connell as trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, pursuant to § 55-547.06 of the Code of Virginia (1 950, as amended);


August 8, 2000 -   (Jesse Wilson's Report to the Judges) 
"To the Honorable Judges of Said Court:
RE: Estate of Harold A. OConnell, Trust
Fiduciary No. 21840
1. By a Tenth Account duly filed herein and approved by the undersigned on August 25, 1995, the trustee herein, Anthony M. 0'Connell, properly accounted for all of the remaining assets reported as being assets of the trust created by the will of Harold OConnell and reported a zero balance on hand. A copy of said account is filed herewith as Exhibit 1.
2. By an Eleventh Account, Anthony M. OConnell, trustee, again reported zero assets on hand and no receipts or disbursements. A copy of said account is filed herewith as Exhibit 2.
3. Both the Tenth and Eleventh accounts carried the notation "This is not a final account".
4. In the ordinary case, an account which shows the distribution of all remaining assets is filed as a Final Account, and its approval terminates the fiduciary's responsibility to the Court and permits the Commissioner of Accounts to close the file.
5. The said trustee has also filed a Twelfth Account in which he reports as an asset $659.97 "due from the Estate of Jean M. OConnell".  A copy of that "account" is enclosed herewith as Exhibit 3.
6. The Estate of Jean M. OConnell, deceased, Fiduciary No. 49160, was closed in the Commissioner of Accounts office after approval of a Final Account on May 31, 1994.
7. The said $659.97 was the subject of correspondence between the said trustee and Edward J. White, attorney and co-executor of the estate of Jean M. OConnell, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits 4 and 5. In his letter,
Exhibit 5, the trustee explains that the $659.97 is part of a net income payment of $1,475.97 which the trust owed the estate of Jean M. OConnell. In that same letter, the trustee states that "At this point in time, I believe Mr. Balderson and I are of one mind that the estate does not owe the trust and the trust does not owe the estate".
Mr. Balderson was a CPA for the estate. Both of these letters were provided to the Commissioner of Accounts by the trustee in support of his "Twelfth Account".
8. The trustee also provided the Commissioner with a copy of a page from a "Jean M. OConnell estate tax analysis" which shows $659.97 under "Assets" of that estate as "Debt from Harold OConnell Trust".  A copy of that page is attached as Exhibits 6.
From a review of this information the Commissioner finds that there is no evidence to support an assertion by the trustee that the $659.97 is an asset of the trust. To the contrary, it appears that either it is not a debt at all, or, from the estate's point of view, it was money owed by the trust to the estate, i.e. an asset of the estate of Jean M. OConnell. That estate has been closed for more that six years.
Accordingly, the foregoing Eleventh Account of Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee has been marked a "Final Account" by the undersigned and is hereby approved as a Final Account in the trust under the will of Harold A. OConnell and is filed herewith.
In the event that the trustee is successful in recovering $659.97 or any other funds which are proper trust assets to be accounted for, such may be reported to the Commissioner of Accounts by an Amended Inventory and, thereafter, accounted for by proper accounts.

GIVEN under my hand this 8th day of August, 2000.
Respectfully submitted,
Jesse B. Wilson, III 
Commissioner of Accounts
Fairfax County, Virginia
JBW:jcs
Enc.: Exhibits, 1 - 6
cc: Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee"
(See the exhibits in the pdf reference)

Compare

Please compare my actual 12th account to the Commissioner of Accounts description of it in his Report to the Judges.

To Judges
To Judges 121p

10th account 17p
11th account 22p
12th delinquent 8p
12th account 22p
13th draft 5p


I filed an Exception to the Commissioner's Account.
It disappeared after being received by the Court on August 23, 2000.
Exceptions to report 2000 52p
Exceptions email rusk 3p




2012
9

Take Farm

(I call my 77 acres in Highland County a farm even though a farm there is about 300 to 400 acres)









I also have two real estate properties in Rockingham County, Virginia. History suggests they are "hooked" also.
I can't penetrate the secrecy.


10

Coverup by Complaint

29. On August 8, 2000, an Eleventh Account for the Harold Trust was approved by the Commissioner of Accounts for the Circuit Court of Fairfax County and determined to be a final account.
30. Anthony repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged the Commissioner's determination and requested, inter alia, that the Court and the Commissioner of Accounts investigate a debt of $659.97 that he alleged was owed to the Harold Trust by Mrs. O'Connell's estate. In these proceedings, the Commissioner stated, and the court agreed, that there was no evidence to support Anthony's claims that a debt existed and, if so, that it was an asset of the Harold Trust.
31. Anthony's repeated and unsuccessful challenges to the rulings of the Commissioner of Accounts and the Circuit Court in connection with the Eleventh Account, and his persistence in pursuing his unfounded claims to the present day, demonstrate that he is unable to administer the Harold Trust effectively and reliably.
32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.
32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.
33. The removal of Anthony as trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:
A. That the Court remove Anthony Minor O'Connell as trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, pursuant to § 55-547.06 of the Code of Virginia (1 950, as amended);



2012.08.30 Their signature cover is to use a trusting family member to unwittingly divide, destabilize, and disempower, the family they victimize. They had my sister take me to Court. This skips over exposing the accounting at http://www.book467page191money.com. This is what the uninterrupted agenda described in the lawyer's letter of April 22, 1992, does .

COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Jean Mary O'Connell Nader, by counsel, and brings this action pursuant to § 26-48 and 55-547.06 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) for the removal and appointment of a trustee, and in support thereof states the following.
Parties and Jurisdiction
1. Plaintiff Jean Mary O’Connell Nader ("Jean") and *Defendants Anthony Miner O’Connell ("Anthony") and Sheila Ann O'Connell ("Sheila") are the children of Harold A. O’Connell ("Mr. O’Connell"), who died in 1975, and Jean M. O'Connell ("Mrs. O'Connell"), who died on September 15, 1991.
2. The trusts that are the subject of this action are: (a) the trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell dated April 11, 1974, and admitted to probate in this Court on June 18, 1975; and (b) a Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, which was recorded among the land records of this Court in Deed Book 8845 at Page 1449.
3. Jean, Sheila, and Anthony are the beneficiaries of both of the trusts and, therefore, are the parties interested in this proceeding.
Facts
4. During their lifetimes, Mr. and Mrs. O'Connell owned as *tenants in common a parcel of unimproved real estate identified by Tax Map No. 0904-0 1-00 17 and located near the Franconia area of Fairfax County, Virginia and consisting of approximately 15 acres (the "Property").
5. After his death in 1975, a 46.0994% interest in the Property deriving fiom Mr, O'Connell's original 50% share was transferred to a trust created under his Last Will and Testament (the "Harold Trust"), of which Anthony serves as trustee. A copy of the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
6. Mrs. O'Connell held a life interest in the Harold Trust and, upon her death in 1991, the trust assets were to be distributed in equal shares to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony as remainder beneficiaries. Although other assets of the Harold Trust were distributed to the remainder beneficiaries, the trust's 46.0994% interest in the Property has never been distributed to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony in accordance with the terms of the Harold Trust.
7. After Mrs. O'Connell's death, her 53.9006% interest in the Property passed to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony in equal shares, pursuant to the terms of her Last Will and Testament and Codicil thereto, which was admitted to probate in this Court on December 10, 1991.
8. Thus, after Mrs. O'Connell's death, Jean, Sheila, and Anthony each owned a 17.96687% interest in the Property, and the Harold Trust continued to own a 49.0994% interest in the Property.
9. By a Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, Jean, Sheila, and Anthony, individually and in his capacity as trustee of the Harold Trust, created a Land Trust (the "Land Trust"), naming Anthony as initial trustee. A copy of the Land Trust Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated by reference herein. The Harold Trust, Jean, Sheila, and Anthony (individually) are the beneficiaries of the Land Trust.
10. The Property was thereafter conveyed by Jean, Sheila, and Anthony, individually and as trustee of the Harold Trust, to Anthony, as trustee of the Land Trust, by a Deed dated October 16,1992 and recorded on October 23,1992 in Deed Book 8307 at Page 1446 among the land records for Fairfax County.
11. As trustee under the Land Trust, Anthony was granted broad powers and responsibilities in connection with the Property, including the authority and obligation to sell the Property. Paragraph 4.04 of the Land Trust Agreement states, in part, as follows:
If the Property or any part thereof remains in this trust at the expiration of twenty (20) years from date hereof, the Trustee shall promptly sell the Property at a public sale after a reasonable public advertisement and reasonable notice thereof to the Beneficiaries.
12. To date, the Property has not been sold, and the Land Trust is due to expire on October 16,2012.
13. According to Paragraph 9.03 of the Land Trust Agreement, the responsibility for payment of all real estate taxes on the Property is to be shared proportionately by the beneficiaries. However, if a beneficiary does not pay his or her share, the Land Trust Agreement provides: The Trustee will pay the shortfall and shall be reimbursed the principal plus 10% interest per annum. Trustee shall be reimbursed for any outstanding real estate tax shares or other Beneficiary shared expense still owed by any Beneficiary at settlement on the eventual sale of the property.
14. For many years, Jean sent payment to Anthony for her share of the real estate
taxes on the Property. Beginning in or about 1999, Anthony refused to accept her checks because they were made payable to "County of Fairfax." Anthony insisted that any checks for the real estat'k taxes be made payable to him individually, and he has returned or refused to forward Jean's checks to Fairfax County. Under the circumstances, Jean is unwilling to comply with Anthony's demands regarding the tax payments.
15. Anthony is not willing or has determined he is unable to sell the Property due to a mistaken interpretation of events and transactions concerning the Property and, upon information and belief, the administration of his mother's estate. Anthony's position remains intractable, despite court rulings against him, professional advice, and independent evidence. As a result, Anthony is unable to effectively deal with third parties and the other beneficiaries of the Land Trust.
16. In 2007, Anthony received a reasonable offer from a potential buyer to purchase the Property. Upon information and belief, Anthony became convinced of a title defect with the Property that, in his opinion, was an impediment to the sale of the Property. A title commitment issued by Stewart Title and Escrow on April 24,2007, attached hereto as Exhibit C, did not persuade Anthony that he, as the trustee of the Land Trust, had the power to convey the Property. Because of this and other difficulties created by Anthony, the Property was not sold.
17. Since 2007, it appears the only effort put forth by Anthony to sell the Property has been to post it for sale on a website he created, http://www.alexandriavirginial5acres.com
18. Since 2009, Anthony has failed to pay the real estate taxes for the Property as required by the Lhd Trust Agreement. Currently, the amount of real estate tax owed, including interest and penalties, is approximately $27,738.00.
19. Anthony has stated that he purposely did not pay the real estate taxes in order to force a sale of the Property and clear up the alleged title defects.
20. Since the real estate taxes are more than two years delinquent, Anthony's failure to pay may result in a tax sale of the Property. Anthony was notified of this possibility by a notice dated October 26, 201 1, attached hereto as Exhibit D. In addition to the threatened tax sale, the Land Trust is incurring additional costs, including penalties, interest, and fees, that would not be owed if Anthony had paid the real estate taxes in a timely manner.
21. In May 20 12, Jean, through her counsel, wrote a letter to Anthony requesting that he cooperate with a plan to sell the Property or resign as trustee. To date, Anthony has not expressed a willingness to do either, and still maintains that the alleged title defect and other "entanglements" must be resolved before any action can be taken towards a sale of the Property.
Count I: Removal of Anthony O'Connell as Trustee of Land Trust
22: The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 21 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
23. As trustee of the Land Trust, Anthony has a fiduciary duty to comply with the terms of the trust agreement, to preserve and protect the trust assets, and to exercise reasonable care, skill, and caution in the administration of the trust assets.
24. Anthony has breached his fiduciary duties by his unreasonable, misguided, and imprudent actions, including but not limited to, his failure to sell the Property and non-payment of the real estate taxes on the Property.
25. The breaches of duty by Anthony constitute good cause for his removal as trustee of the Land Trust.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:
A. That the Court remove Anthony Minor O'Connell as trustee under the Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, pursuant to 26-48 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended);
B. That all fees payable to Anthony Minor O'Connell under the terms of the aforesaid Land Trust Agreement, including but not limited to, the trustee's compensation under paragraph 9.01, and all interest on advancements by the trustee to the trust for payment of real estate taxes pursuant to paragraph 9.03, be disallowed and deemed forfeited;
C. That all costs incurred by Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader in this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees, be paid by the Land Trust; and
D. For all such further relief as this Court deems reasonable and proper.
Count 11: Removal of Anthony O'Connell as Trustee of the Trust under the Will of Harold A. O'Connell
26. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 25 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
27. The terms of the Harold Trust provide that, upon the death of Mrs. O'Connell, the assets are to be distributed to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony in equal shares. Notwithstanding the terms of the Harold Trust and the provisions for its termination, Anthony entered into the Land Trust Agreement in his capacity as trustee of the Harold Trust. As a result, upon the sale of the Property, Anthony can exercise greater control over the Harold Trust's share of the sale proceeds than if the parties held their beneficial interests in their individual capacities.
28, Other than its status as beneficiary of the Land Trust, there is no reason for the continuation of the Harold Trust.
29. On August 8,2000, an Eleventh Account for the Harold Trust was approved by the Commissioner of Accounts for the Circuit Court of Fairfax County and determined to be a final account.
30. Anthony repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged the Commissioner's determination and requested, inter alia, that the Court and the Commissioner of Accounts investigate a debt of $659.97 that he alleged was owed to the Harold Trust by Mrs. O'Connell's estate. In these proceedings, the Commissioner stated, and the court agreed, that there was no evidence to support Anthony's claims that a debt existed and, if so, that it was an asset of the Harold Trust.
31. Anthony's repeated and unsuccessful challenges to the rulings of the Commissioner of Accounts and the Circuit Court in connection with the Eleventh Account, and his persistence in pursuing his unfounded claims to the present day, demonstrate that he is unable to administer the Harold Trust effectively and reliably.
32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.
33. The removal of Anthony as trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:
A. That the Court remove Anthony Minor O'Connell as trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, pursuant to § 55-547.06 of the Code of Virginia (1 950, as amended);
B. That all costs incurred by Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Comell Nader in this action including reasonable attorneys' fees, be awarded to her in accordance with § 55- 550.04 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and
C. For all such further relief as this Court deems reasonable and proper.
Count 111: Appointment of Successor Trustee
34. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 33 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.
35. Jean is a proper person to serve as trustee of the Land Trust in order to sell the Property on behalf of the beneficiaries of the Land Trust, and she is willing and able to serve in such capacity.
36. The best interests of the beneficiaries would be served if the Land Trust is continued for a sufficient period of time to allow the successor trustee to sell the Property, rather than allowing the Land Trust to terminate on the date specified in the Land Trust Agreement. Each of the individual beneficiaries of the Land Trust is age 70 or above, and it would be prudent to sell the Property during their lifetimes, if possible, rather than leaving the matter for the next generation to resolve.
37. Jean is a proper person to serve as trustee of the trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, and she is willing and able to serve in such capacity.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:
A. That Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader be appointed as successor trustee under the aforesaid Land Trust Agreement, with the direction to sell the Property upon such terms and conditions as this Court deems reasonable and appropriate, including, but not limited to, fixing a reasonable amount as compensation of the successor trustee for her services;
B. That the term of the Land Trust be continued for a reasonable time in order to allow for the sale of the Property;
C. That Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader be appointed as successor trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell for all purposes, including distribution of the net proceeds of the sale of the Property that are payable to such trust;
D. That all costs incurred by Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader in this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees, be paid by the Land Trust; and E. For all such further relief as this Court deems reasonable and proper.

 


No one recognizes this Deed that has been in the Court records since October 23, 1992, or says why it should not be recognized. This takes cooperation. It is an invisible hook.

Ignoring my Deed as Trustee and not saying why rendered me powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Connect the dots. My family doesn't understand this. No one recognizes this setup. It is an invisible hook.
http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

And by extension, make my1992 Deed as Trustee null and void? I signed the 1992 Trust Deed as one of the Grantors; as "Anthony Miner O'Connell, Trustee, under the last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell"? Is there a just power who would risk breaking the secrecy and finding out?

11

Coverup by Order

IT APPEARING TO THE COURT as follows:
1.The material facts set forth in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action are
deemed to be admitted by Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule
1:4(e);- based on the failure of Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell to deny such facts in the
responsive pleading filed by him, entitled "Response to Summons Served on September 8,
2012.
"

Order
Signed by Chief Judge Smith on January 25, 2013
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/order5p.pdf

Seventeen of my eighteen responses to the Complaint dissappeared
after being received by the Court on September 25, 2012 at 10:44am

Please look at my "Response to Summons Served on September 8, 2012." It included a complete copy of my Deed as Trustee. Ignoring my Deed as Trustee blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. No one recognizes this cause and effect. No one recognizes this setup. www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/overview62p.pdf

Please look at my seventeen responses that disappeared after being received by the Court on 9/25/2012 at 10:44 am.

 1   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/1-545820-23p.pdf
 2   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/2-bk467p191-8p.pdf
 3   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/3-blueprint4p.pdf
 4   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/4-canweconnectthedots2p.pdf
 5   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/5-codeofconduct18p.pdf
 6   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/6-commitments-Individually8p.pdf
 7   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/7-compute-tax-test35p.pdf
 8   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/8-exceptions1994disappeared.pdf
 9   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/9-exceptions2000disappeared.pdf
10  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/10-overview72p.pdf                          (Includes complete Deed)
11  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/11-percentages12p.pdf            
12  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/12-precedence17p.pdf
13  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/13-tax-records94p.pdf
14  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/14-trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf       (Includes complete Deed)
15  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/15-trust-documents42p.pdf              (Includes complete Deed)
16  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/16-unknown14p.pdf                         (Includes first 3 pages of Deed)
17  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/17-usingIRS15p.p
      www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/all-18responses714p.pdf                  (Includes multile copies of Deed)
   

Complaint - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/complaint60p.pdf
My responses - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/all18responses714p.pdf
My email verifying 18 responses - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/email-verifying18responses3p.pdf
Order - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/order5p.pdf

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Ignore below here. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
659 below

They plant hooks (aka accounting entanglements, wedges, confusion and conflict) in the family and make the family appear responsible for the consequences. Who ever controls the hook controls the people and assets that are hooked. A simple example is 1,475 - 816 = 659. Small numbers are used to make them appear unworrthy of attention, as if the issue is the amount. The issue is not the amount. The issue is that they entangle. They are a hook. "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust  659.97" entangles the accounting for the Testamentary Trust with the accounting for our Mother's Estate. Both accounts were done by the CPA and lawyer. To show the importance of this pattern, try to get anyone in the Court, the County, or the Commonwealth of Virginia, to recognize the accounting item "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust ... 659.97" at bk467p192money.com -

The pattern the fraudsters most don't want recognized is their planting of hooks. Who ever controls the hooks (the accountants) controls the people and assets that are hooked or entangled. Hooks render the family powerless.

Your trust is a hook. Withholding what you need is a hook. Withholding the final account for our Dad's estate is a hook. Ignoring my Deed as Trustee and never saying why is a hook. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. My two Exceptions to the Commissioner's Reports disappearing after being received by the Court is a hook. Seventeen of my eighteen responses to the Complaint used to remove me as Trustee disappearing after being received by the Court is a hook.

It is uncanny how well the simple 1,475 - 816 = 659 example illustrates the dynamics. One indicator of it's significance is the degree those in control go to make it appear insignificant. Small numbers are used to make it appear unworthy of attention. As if the issue were the amount. The issue is not the amount. The issue is that they entangle.

The pattern the fraudsters most don't want recognized is their plantingt of hooks. Who ever controls the hooks controls the people and assets hooked. Hooks render the family powerless. See our other's "First thing" memo. They are invisible. In 25 years, not one person in the Court, in Fairfax County, or in Virginia, recognizes 1,475 - 816 = 659 (rounded from 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97) or the accounting entry at bk467p192 "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . 659.97". It entangles the Trust accounting with the estate accounting. Small numbers are used to make them appear unworthy of attention, as if the issue were the amount and not that they entangle. The issue is that they entangle.

It is uncanny how well this simple example shows the dynamics. It entangles the accounting for the Testamentary Trust with the accounting for our Mother's Estate. It even shows why those who don't want the accounting exposed replace me with my sister, Jean Nader. I experience in accounting and try to expose their accounting trails and see where the money went. They've made Jean Nader so fearful she will not.

One indicator of the significance of the 1,475 - 816 = 659 hook is the degree those in control go to to make it appear insignificant. Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson III substituted my actual 12th Trust account with a fraudulent version in his Report to the Judges. The B&K law firm's Complaint removing me as Trustee says or implies that I should be removed as Trustee for trying to expose the accounting trail for the 659. www.659trail.com

They plant hooks (aka accounting entanglements, wedges, confusion and conflict, cover, obstacles,) in the accounting and make the family appear responsible for the consequences. Who ever controls the hooks controls the people and assets that are hooked. Hooks render the family powerless.

May 19, 1992 - The lawyer frames me with the cpa-lawyer's 1,475 - 816 = 659 hook:
"The K-1 filed by the Trust showed a payment of $816.00 in interest to the estate. You sent a check in the amount of $1475.97 to the estate. What was the remaining $659.97? Do I have this confused with the tax debt/credit situation which ran from the Third Accounting?" 
(From Attorney Edward White's letter to Anthony O'Connell

March 20, 1993 - Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, approves the cpa-lawyer's 1,475 - 816 = 659 hook at bk467p192:
"Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . 659.97"
(From the cpa-lawyer's accounting at bk467p192, approved by the Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson III, on March 20, 1993)

May 26, 1999 - The 12th and 13th interim trust accounts had been declared delinquent. Delinquency fees and recording fees for the 12th court account had been paid and accepted.

August 23, 2000: I filed an Exception to the Commissioner's Report of August 8, 200 that closed my Trust Account, fiduciary # 21840, against my will. My Exceptions disappeared after being received by the Court on August 23, 2000:

If you are hiring an attorney for the whole family; never, never, allow secrecy between family members. Or your family may fall into the two attorney trap. Our Mother did not hire a lawyer to fight me. I did not hire a lawyer to fight our Mother. But it's made to look that way.

I believe the CPA unilateral brought the lawyer aboard like the lawyer unilaterally bought the CPA aboard in 1992 (See Edward White's letter of April 22,1992). The CPA and lawyer hid from me. I didn't know lawyer #1 existed. I hired a lawyer for the whole family because nothing was being done. To my surprise he become lawyer #2. This structurally divides the family. This structural divide was used to divide, destabilize, and disempower our family.

Withholding what you need is a hook. Ignoring my Deed as Trustee and never saying why is a hook. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money.

They plant hooks (aka accounting entanglements, wedges, confusion and conflict, cover, obstacles,) in the accounting and make the family appear responsible for the consequences. Who ever controls the hooks controls the people and assets that are hooked. Hooks render the family powerless.

(1992, May 19; from Attorney Edward White's letter to Anthony O'Connell)
"The K-1 filed by the Trust showed a payment of $816.00 in interest to the estate. You sent a check in the amount of $1475.97 to the estate. What was the remaining $659.97? Do I have this confused with the tax debt/credit situation which ran from the Third Accounting?

(1993, March 20; from the CPA Joanne Barnes and the Attorney Edward White's accounting at bk467p192, approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson III, on March 20, 1993.)
"Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . . . 659.97"

Comment:
Small numbers are used to make accounting hooks appear unworthy of attention, as if the issue were the amount. The issue is not the amount. The issue is they hook people and assets. Who ever controls the hook controls the people and assets that are hooked. Hooks render the family powerless:

Should you vet them yourself by testing their transparency

The 1,475 - 816 = 659 hook starts here

Two attorney trap

Mother   Son

If you are hiring an attorney for the whole family, never allow secrecy between family members. The CPA and lawyer destroyed my relationship with my Mother and then my relatioship with my sister by creating walls of secrecy and planting hooks.

Edward White - Edward White is an attorney who, I believe, the CPA Joanne Barnes connected to our Mother. All this is a secret from me, the named Trustee in the Testamentary Trust established by our Dad's Will, probated in 1976. (What happened between 1976 and 1985? I don't know. The nine years of secrecy suggest, I believe, that the CPA Joanne Barnes made millions of dollars disappear.) Neither the CPA or the attorney, who pretend they don't know each other, contacted me about anything. Our Mother apparently bought their policy of secrecy and that was fatal.

(above) If Commissioner of Accounts Robert J. McClandish, Jr.. had not told our Mother and I that the testamentary trust described in our Father's Will had to be funded we would never have known. Our Father died in 1975 and his Will was probated in 1976. I believe our Mother's CPA Joanne Barnes, had been doing the accounting since 1976. I wonder how his Will could be probated without the Testamentary Trust being recognized and addressed. Was it for the same reasons that my 1992 Deed as Trustee is being ignored?  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com/deed-webs/deed-webs-home.html  

Beware of the two attorney setup. Our Mother assumes the CPA and lawyer are working for the good of the whole family. When I hired a lawyer for the whole family after nothing is being done, the lawyer that our Mother hired (More likely The CPA added him of her own volition) for the whole decides to represent only her. The lawyer I hired for the whole family decides he is only representing me. Presto; one lawyer represening one part of the family and one lawyer representing another part of the family. They will tear our family apart and supplaint the famly fiduciary and take control of family's assets. It is better to go without legal council than to fall for the two lawyer pattern.

If you are hiring an attorney for the whole family; never, never, allow secrecy between family members. Or your family may fall into the two attorney trap. Our Mother did not hire a lawyer to fight me. I did not hire a lawyer to fight our Mother. But it's made to look that way.

I believe the CPA unilateral brought the lawyer aboard like the lawyer unilaterally bought the CPA aboard in 1992 (See Edward White's letter of April 22,1992). The CPA and lawyer hid from me. I didn't know lawyer #1 existed. I hired a lawyer for the whole family because nothing was being done. To my surprise he become lawyer #2. This structurally divides the family. This structural divide was used to divide, destabilize, and disempower our family.

The fraudsters signature cover is to divide, destabilize, and disempower, the family they victimize. Secrecy is essential to the fraudsters and fatal to the family. Invisible walls blocking communication between family members are essential. The fraudsters cannot work if they cannot establish a policy of secrecy between family members. If your family does not accept the policy of secrecy, the fraudsters will leave. Never, never, never, agree to secrecy between family members.

A basic pattern is get the family to hire two lawyers. The only thing they need is your trust. One family member hires lawyer 1 to represent the whole family. But lawyer 1 conceals himself and does no work. Another family member, seeing that no work is being done, hires lawyer 2 to represent the whole family. Then lawyer 1 comes out of hiding and pretends to represent only a part of the family. And makes the remaining part of the family an adversary. Lawyer 2 is left to represent the "adversary".

When you have two lawyers, one supposedly working for one family member and one working for another, they can legally justify secrecy by calling it client - lawyer confidentiality. If you recognize the two lawyer pattern you still have to choose between getting legal advice by hiring another lawyer, or forgo legal advice by not hiring another lawyer.

The fraudsters signature cover is to divide, destabilize, and disempower, the family they victimize. Secrecy is essential to the fraudsters and fatal to the family. Invisible walls blocking communication between family members are essential. The fraudsters cannot work if they cannot establish a policy of secrecy between family members. If your family does not accept the policy of secrecy, the fraudsters will leave. Never, never, never, agree to secrecy between family members if you want your family to remain whole..

"Lawyer fix"

The public should know that the fraudsters and their colaborators will covertly have a member of your family come into to the Court and do something that effects you.

It's been more than 32 years now and whatever the lawyer fixed and had Jean O'Connell come into to the Court and do remains concealed. Was it to sign what the "lawyer fixed"? Was it something under the guise of a usual and customary document concerning a bond and/or non-resident fiduciaries, but the actual intent is to keep me away from the fraudsters accounting by blocking me from qualifying as Trustee? I have experience in accounting and try to expose their accounting.

What ever the lawyer fixed, and apparently had our Mother come into Court to sign, remains concealed. My guess is that the fraudsters instructed our Mother to come in to the Court to sign something under the guise that it was a usual and customary document concerning a bond and/or non-resident fiduciaries. I believe the actual intent was to block me from qualifying as Trustee.

My best guess is that this still unknown something is actually intended and use to shut me out, to justify saying that the non-resident fiduciary Anthony O'Connell could not qualify as Trustee for the Testamentary Trust established by our Dad's Will probated in 1976.

(above) What did the fraudsters have our Mother come in to the Court and do? That blocked me from qualifing as Trustee on May 1, 1986? That remains concealed? Call it document "bond problem"

What did the fraudsters have our Mother come in to the Court and do?
  Call it document "X"

(above) What did the fraudsters have our Mother come in to the Court and do? That blocked me from qualifing as Trustee on May 1, 1986? That remains concealed? Call it document "bond problem"

To get to the truth it is absolutely essential to expose the document(s)(?) that the accountants had our Mother come in to the Court and sign. This is core. History suggests that our Mother and her family did not have a chance against the accountants after she followed the "lawyer fix" and "come in" instructions.

1) Plant obstacle.
1985-1986, plant "lawyer fix" obstacle in the Court records to block me from qualifying as Trustee. Frame Jean OConnell (Mother) with it by instructing her to carry it out. Keep it secret in the Court records so it can be shown or concealed depending on the situation.

2) "Lawyer fix" obstacle blocking me from qualifing as trustee is made to appear as my refusal to qualify as Trustee. And therefore I should be removed as Trustee.

(Comment: Why would Mr. Mackall have me come from Saint Louis, Missouri, to Fairfax, Virginia, to qualify in Court? But after my telling him that the named non-resident trustee H. A. Higham and I have known each other since high school, ask us to wait outside the Court while he went in by himself? And after coming out tell us that there was a bond broblem that prevents us (or just Anthny OConnell? I don't remember the exact words)What is the bond problem document Mr. Mackall ran into?) My physical presence wasn't deemed necessary when he had me and Mr. H. A. Higham qualified on June x, 1986.

* My guess for Mr Mackall telling us to wait outside is that the level of trust between me and and H. A. Higham would interfere with the "lawyer fix" obstacle that apparently disqualified me as Trustee but not H. A. Higham.

 

"First thing"

Mother's agenda: First thing is to have the final accounting    Send it to me - Do I have to sign it."
Versus
CPA-lawyer's agenda:"Call - Will do draft of final accting.    deed to property - convey to court.    needs how much"  

Planting hooks. Whoever controls the hooks controls the people and assets that are hooked. The CPA and lawyer use the hooks to divide, destabilize, and disempower the family they victimize, supplant the family fiduciaries, take control of the family's assets, and make money disappear. "Will do draft of the final accting   deed to property - convey to court.   Needs how much.", are hooks.
In May(?) June(?) July(?) of 1985 - Our Mother tells her CPA "First thing is to have the final accounting based on same figures as in the 1st accting. Send it to me - do I have to sign it?" Twelve - fourteen months later, on June 26, 1992, the lawyer tells our Mother "Miss Barnes will contact you at the time your signature is needed."

Henry Mackall - I was visiting my Mother when she showed me the out going Commissione of Accounts letter dated May 8, 1985. It said the Testamentary Trust established by our Father's Will, probated in 1976, had to be funded.

Notice

I believe this Court Notice says I am to travel from Arizona to Fairfax, Virginia, for a hearing for an unidentified issue where no evidence will be taken. I believe "In re: Harold A. O'Connell" means my 1992 Deed as Trustee will continue to be ignored.

 

Responses disappear

"1. The material facts set forth in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action are
deemed to be admitted by Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule
1:4(e);- based on the failure of Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell to deny such facts in the
responsive pleading filed by him, entitled "Response to Summons Served on September 8,
2012.
"

Please look at my "Response to Summons Served on September 8, 2012." It included a complete copy of my Deed as Trustee. Ignoring my Deed as Trustee blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. No one recognizes this. No one. www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/overview62p.pdf

"1. The material facts set forth in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action are
deemed to be admitted by Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule
1:4(e);- based on the failure of Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell to deny such facts in the
responsive pleading filed by him, entitled "Response to Summons Served on September 8,2012."
(From Chief Judge Smith's Order of January 15, 2013)

I anticipated something like this so I verified that they were sent in three ways: By USPS return receipt, by email to multiple recipients, and by letter to Chief Judge Dennis J. Smith. On 9/25/2012, seventeen (17) of my responses were received by the Court at 10:44 AM. Stephanie Walker signed for them. They weighed 6 lbs and 1 oz and cost $62.85 to ship.  USPS EI480187651US. 

Going right for the jugular under the guise of a fiduciary relationship appears to be the perfect cover. The secrecy is impenetrable. Secrecy is essential to the fraudsters and fatal to the family. The secrecy is impenetrable. Please ask Virginia Senators Mark Warner and Tim Kaine to break the secrecy. If they don't, I don't believe anyone in Virginia will. The public should know what can happen to them if they try to expose the fraudster's accounting.

 

The CPA - lawyer hook our homeplace.
("Deed to property - convey to court", "Agreement")

Who ever controls the hooks controls the people and assets that are hooked. The CPA and lawyer use the hooks to divide, destablize, and disempower the family they victimize; supplant the family fiduciaries; take control of the family's assets; and make money disappear. This advice that our Mother trusted are hooks. - "I had hoped that the procedure of setting up the trust could be simplified by putting title tothe resident estate (my home) in the names of my three children - the same as listed in the will to receive it to receive it." are hooks.

 

My 1988 sale

Anyone representing the "Seller" represents all of the grantors comprising the "Seller". All or none of the grantors comprising the "Seller" are represented. The "Seller" can not be divided.)

The Dreyfus Affair.

The public should know, based on my experience what will happen to them if they try to expose the fraudster's accounting. I've been set up and character assasinated since 1985 for trying to break through the secrecy. It reminds me of the Dreyfus Affair. A French military officer of Jewish descent is falsely accused, convicted. and sent to Devil's Island. The French Governtment and military don't like it when their coverup is exposed by Emile Zola's newspaper article. Zola, the figure being pointed to in Edoward Manet's painting, is sentenced to a year in prison.
Whistle blower retaliations
Kill the messernger  

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Stopped here June 2^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

www.book8307page1446deed.com/deed-webs/deed-webs-home.html

(Insert judges 2000 link) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/judges2000/judges2000home.html

History suggest that the clause "ANTHONY MINER O’CONNELL, Trustee Under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O’Connell" in the 1992 Trust documents such as the deed for Accotink will not be recognized in the settlement of a sale of Accotink and what ever might be used to justify it not being recognized will remain unknown:

This pattern of unknowns is one reason why the sale of Accotink had to be on hold. Can we find out what the lawyer fixed? Can we get the accountants to take a position on whether Anthony O'Connell did, or did not, qualify as co-trustee u/w of H. A. O'Connell on June 20, 1986, and that he was still qualified as co-trustee u/w of H. A. O'Connell on October 16, 1992, when he signed the 1992 for Accotink as one of the Grantors, so that all concerned can rely upon it? It's been thirty-two years now.

I am guessing that the the media doesn't tell the public how the accounting fraud works because they don't want to risk being sued for libel.


 



http://www.659trail.com     
http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com   
http://www.book467page191money.com              
http://www.book8307page1446deed.com   
http://www.canweconnectthedots.com      (Best reference)     
http://www.canwelookattheevidence.com 
http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com   
http://www.chiefjudgetrumbo.com
http://www.farm139.com
http://www.fbispringfield.com
http://www.followthetrails.com
http://www.followthetrails2013.com
http://www.inreharoldaoconnell.com
http://www.judgesfairfaxcounty.com      
http://www.removethesecrecy.com  
http://www.stoppedmedicine.com     
http://www.tucsonva.com 
http://www.unknownlien.com