Fraudulent Complaint

This Complaint was prepared by the law firm of B&K (Blankingship & Keith) for my sister Jean Nader to sign (Jean O'Connell Nader, 350 Fourth Avenue, New Kensington, PA 15068, Tel 724-337-7537). This is an example of what she has been lead to believe.

Those who don't want the accounting exposed want me out because I try to expose the accounting, They want Jean Nader in because she would not try to expose the accounting. They use her as unwitting cover. Try to expose the accounting and see. http://www.book467page191money.com

The primary set up behind this Complaint is remarkable. The Trust Deed, which has been in the Court records since October 23, 1992, is ignored. No explanation is given for it not to be recognized. It is not actually said that it is not recognized. It is just ignored. How is it possible that this level of silence and conspiracy can be maintained to the present, is astounding. remarkable.

Ignoring the Deed, the covert non-recognition of the Deed, renders me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocks me from selling the Trust property and forces me to pay the real estate taxes until I run out of money. It sabotages my work. It sabotages my Trusteeship.

Blocking me from selling the Trust property and forcing me to pay the real estate taxes until I run out of money is made to appear as my fault. It is used to justify removing me as Trustee using this Complaint.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. You have to recognize this cause and effect.   http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

 











 

Background

On March 30, 2012, after nineteen (19) years of trying to go through traditional channels to expose the accounting for our Mother's Estate, I tried to bring attention to it by posting  http://www.canweconnectthedots.com .

About five (5) weeks after I posted http://www.canweconnectthedots.com , my 77 acres in in Highland County, Virginia, is taken over using an illegal lien. The lien is so secret those in control won't identify the property it is placed against. It's been five (5) years now.

About eight (8) weeks after I posted http://www.canweconnectthedots.com , the process of taking over my livelyhood, the Trust property of 15 acres, in Fairfax County, Virginia, is began. the property described in the Deed at http://www.book8307page1446deed.com  using this Complant.

The accounting for our Mother's Estate at bk467p191 remains concealed. Our Mother did not want money to disappear from her estate or her family torn apart to cover it up. The only way to get to the truth is to remove the secrecy, expose the trails, follow the trails, and recognize the trails.

Who is trying to expose the accounting and who is trying to cover it up? The complaint covers up the accounting.

Example 1 - Compare the page from the accounting with the page from the complaint. Which one should you trust? "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust ...659.97" in the accounting is the simplest example of planting confusion and conflict. ). The accounting trail is 475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97. The only way to get to the truth is to expose, follow, and recognize, the accounting trails. You can aways trust 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97

Page from the accounting

Page from the Complaint



Example 2- Make money disappear. A cash payment of $545,820.43 is made to the Estate of Jean O'Connell [Our Mother'] on April 21, 1992, for the full payoff of the Lynch Note. But only the interest of $26,917.17 is reported. ("Int Lynch Prop Note DOD 4/21/92 26.917.17"). The difference of $518, 903.26 disappears.
The accounting trail is $545,820.43 - $26,917.17 = $518,903.26. The only way to get to the truth is to expose, follow, and recognize, the accounting trails. You can always trust $545,820.43 - $26,917.17 = $518,903.26.


















Complaint with comments

"NOW the Plaintiff, Jean Mary O'Connell Nader, by counsel, and brings this action pursuant to § 26-48 and 55-547.06 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) for the removal and appointment of a trustee, and in support thereof states the following.
Parties and Jurisdiction

1. Plaintiff Jean Mary O’Connell Nader ("Jean") and *Defendants Anthony Miner O’Connell ("Anthony") and Sheila Ann O'Connell ("Sheila") are the children of Harold A. O’Connell ("Mr. O’Connell"), who died in 1975, and Jean M. O'Connell ("Mrs. O'Connell"), who died on September 15, 1991.

Why is the Trust Deed not recognized? Why are the contents of the Trust Agreement not recognized? Why is it not recognized that "Anthony O'Connell, Trustee" is not individually liable?
a) From the Trust Deed: "The Trustee shall have no individual liability or obligation whatsoever........".
b) From the Trust Agreement: "8. Trustee Not Individually Liable:"

2. The trusts that are the subject of this action are: (a) the trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell dated April 11, 1974, and admitted to probate in this Court on June 18, 1975; and (b) a Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, which was recorded among the land records of this Court in Deed Book 8845 at Page 1449.

Closing these trusts covers up the accounting for these trusts.

Items 2-9 make it appear that the Deed did not exist.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  

3. Jean, Sheila, and Anthony are the beneficiaries of both of the trusts and, therefore, are the parties interested in this proceeding.

Items 2-9 make it appear that the Deed did not exist.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  

4. During their lifetimes, Mr. and Mrs. O'Connell owned as *tenants in common a parcel of unimproved real estate identified by Tax Map No. 0904-0 1-00 17 and located near the Franconia area of Fairfax County, Virginia and consisting of approximately 15 acres (the "Property").

Items 2-9 make it appear that the Deed did not exist.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  

5. After his death in 1975, a 46.0994% interest in the Property deriving fiom Mr, O'Connell's original 50% share was transferred to a trust created under his Last Will and Testament (the "Harold Trust"), of which Anthony serves as trustee. A copy of the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

6. Mrs. O'Connell held a life interest in the Harold Trust and, upon her death in 1991, the trust assets were to be distributed in equal shares to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony as remainder beneficiaries. Although other assets of the Harold Trust were distributed to the remainder beneficiaries, the trust's 46.0994% interest in the Property has never been distributed to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony in accordance with the terms of the Harold Trust.

Items 2-9 make it appear that the Deed did not exist.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  

7. After Mrs. O'Connell's death, her 53.9006% interest in the Property passed to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony in equal shares, pursuant to the terms of her Last Will and Testament and Codicil thereto, which was admitted to probate in this Court on December 10, 1991.

Items 2-9 make it appear that the Deed did not exist.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  

8. Thus, after Mrs. O'Connell's death, Jean, Sheila, and Anthony each owned a 17.96687% interest in the Property, and the Harold Trust continued to own a 49.0994% interest in the Property.

Items 2-9 make it appear that the Deed did not exist.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  

9. By a Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, Jean, Sheila, and Anthony, individually and in his capacity as trustee of the Harold Trust, created a Land Trust (the "Land Trust"), naming Anthony as initial trustee. A copy of the Land Trust Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated by reference herein. The Harold Trust, Jean, Sheila, and Anthony (individually) are the beneficiaries of the Land Trust.

Items 2-9 make it appear that the Deed did not exist.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  

10. The Property was thereafter conveyed by Jean, Sheila, and Anthony, individually and as trustee of the Harold Trust, to Anthony, as trustee of the Land Trust, by a Deed dated October 16,1992 and recorded on October 23,1992 in Deed Book 8307 at Page 1446 among the land records for Fairfax County

Item 10 mentions the Trust Deed, but treats it as if it were of no significance. This is the only mention of the Deed. See the Deed at the top, signed by "Jean Mary OConnell Nader" highlighted in yellow.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect. 

11. As trustee under the Land Trust, Anthony was granted broad powers and responsibilities in connection with the Property, including the authority and obligation to sell the Property. Paragraph 4.04 of the Land Trust Agreement states, in part, as follows: "If the Property or any part thereof remains in this trust at the expiration of twenty (20) years from date hereof, the Trustee shall promptly sell the Property at a public sale after a reasonable public advertisement and reasonable notice thereof to the Beneficiaries.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

12. To date, the Property has not been sold, and the Land Trust is due to expire on October 16, 2012.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

13. According to Paragraph 9.03 of the Land Trust Agreement, the responsibility for payment of all real estate taxes on the Property is to be shared proportionately by the beneficiaries. However, if a beneficiary does not pay his or her share, the Land Trust Agreement provides: The Trustee will pay the shortfall and shall be reimbursed the principal plus 10% interest per annum. Trustee shall be reimbursed for any outstanding real estate tax shares or other Beneficiary shared expense still owed by any Beneficiary at settlement on the eventual sale of the property.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

Real estate taxes are the most used vehicle for planting confusion and conflict in the accounting.

Accepting Jean Nader's checks made out to "County of Fairfax" would create an accounting entanglement. Accounting entanglements are used as wedge and takeover tools and as cover. It is unlike Jean Nader to insist on making her check out contrary to my request. Imagine if I asked her to sign a sales contract or deed.

To see if the real estate tax amount of $27,669.17 was just made up, have those who arrived at this figure show how they arrived at this figure. As of November 6, 2010, the individual beneficiaries owed these amounts in real estate taxes:

Sheila O'Connell owed me                    $ 83,568.24.
Jean Nader owned me                           $ 56,615.23.
Anthony O'Connell owed  fairfax         $   6,446.65   

To keep the accounting straight I paid the total real estate taxes for all the beneficiaries and Sheila OConnell and Jean OConnell were to reimburse me. Subtracting $6,446.65 from these three amounts (It's a wash) means Sheila O'Connell owed Anthony OConnell $77,121.59 in reimbursement, and Jean Nader owned Anthony OConnell $50,168.58 in reembursement, for a total of $127,290.17. As of November , 2010, the Trust owned Anthony OConnell $127,290.17. How was it calculated that Anthony OConnell owes $27,738.00? This is a difference of $155,028.17 Why is this OK?





14. For many years, Jean sent payment to Anthony for her share of the real estate
taxes on the Property. Beginning in or about 1999, Anthony refused to accept her checks because they were made payable to "County of Fairfax." Anthony insisted that any checks for the real estate taxes be made payable to him individually, and he has returned or refused to forward Jean's checks to Fairfax County. Under the circumstances, Jean is unwilling to comply with Anthony's demands regarding the tax payments.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

My accepting the check made out to "Fairfax County" would create an accounting entanglement. It would plant confusion and conflict in the accounting. Like "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust .......659.97" at bk467p192.



It is unlike Jean Nader to insist on making her check out contray to my request. I believe someone lead her. It puts me in the position of accepting an accounting entanglement or not getting reimbursed. Can you imagine my getting Jean Nader to sign a sales contract or a deed?

15. Anthony is not willing or has determined he is unable to sell the Property due to a mistaken interpretation of events and transactions concerning the Property and, upon information and belief, the administration of his mother's estate. Anthony's position remains intractable, despite court rulings against him, professional advice, and independent evidence. As a result, Anthony is unable to effectively deal with third parties and the other beneficiaries of the Land Trust.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

16. In 2007, Anthony received a reasonable offer from a potential buyer to purchase the Property. Upon information and belief, Anthony became convinced of a title defect with the Property that, in his opinion, was an impediment to the sale of the Property. A title commitment issued by Stewart Title and Escrow on April 24,2007, attached hereto as Exhibit C, did not persuade Anthony that he, as the trustee of the Land Trust, had the power to convey the Property. Because of this and other difficulties created by Anthony, the Property was not sold.


17. Since 2007, it appears the only effort put forth by Anthony to sell the Property has been to post it for sale on a website he created, http://www.alexandriavirginial5acres.com

I'm guessing someone lead Jean Nader to believe this and then made it appear that Jean was the source. Please see my letter beloe with it's "I wonder if you wonder whether Jean Nader might have intentionally mislead you into brlieving that I have done little to sell Accotink, when it has become obvious that that is not true."



It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

18. Since 2009, Anthony has failed to pay the real estate taxes for the Property as required by the Land Trust Agreement. Currently, the amount of real estate tax owed, including interest and penalties, is approximately $27,738.00.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com



To see if the real estate tax amount of $27,669.17 was just made up, have those who arrived at this figure show how they arrived at this figure. As of November 6, 2010, the individual beneficiaries owed these amounts in real estate taxes:

Sheila O'Connell owed me                    $ 83,568.24.
Jean Nader owned me                           $ 56,615.23.
Anthony O'Connell owed  fairfax         $   6,446.65   

To keep the accounting straight I paid the total real estate taxes for all the beneficiaries and Sheila OConnell and Jean OConnell were to reimburse me. Subtracting $6,446.65 from these three amounts (It's a wash) means Sheila O'Connell owed Anthony OConnell $77,121.59 in reimbursement, and Jean Nader owned Anthony OConnell $50,168.58 in reembursement, for a total of $127,290.17. As of November , 2010, the Trust owned Anthony OConnell $127,290.17. How was it calculated that Anthony OConnell owes $27,738.00? This is a difference of $155,028.17 Why is this OK?


19. Anthony has stated that he purposely did not pay the real estate taxes in order to force a sale of the Property and clear up the alleged title defects .

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

If the implication is that I just decided not to pay the real estate taxes, that is not true. I did not pay the real estate taxes because I ran out of money.


20. Since the real estate taxes are more than two years delinquent, Anthony's failure to pay may result in a tax sale of the Property. Anthony was notified of this possibility by a notice dated October 26, 201 1, attached hereto as Exhibit D. In addition to the threatened tax sale, the Land Trust is incurring additional costs, including penalties, interest, and fees, that would not be owed if Anthony had paid the real estate taxes in a timely manner.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

If the implication is that I just decided not to pay the real estate taxes, or that I didn't know that the taxes were due, that is not true. I did not pay the real estate taxes because I ran out of money.


(Above) B&K's Exhibit D ends here.

(Below) This covert lien to Highland County, Virginia, takes covert control of my farm. The secrecy renders me powerless. I circled the date of May 11, 2012, because I was notifided by the Phoenix VA in Arizona on May 10, 2012, that my application for the poverty pension was virtually buried in amiguity and confuion. It could be a coincidence that I receivied two big financial hits at the same time (May 10-11, 202). I want to keep this simple so I won't go into the lien and buried pension application convergence here.






















21. In May 20 12, Jean, through her counsel, wrote a letter to Anthony requesting that he cooperate with a plan to sell the Property or resign as trustee. To date, Anthony has not expressed a willingness to do either, and still maintains that the alleged title defect and other "entanglements" must be resolved before any action can be taken towards a sale of the Property.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

Count I: Removal of Anthony O'Connell as Trustee of Land Trust

22: The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 21 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com


23. As trustee of the Land Trust, Anthony has a fiduciary duty to comply with the terms of the trust agreement, to preserve and protect the trust assets, and to exercise reasonable care, skill, and caution in the administration of the trust assets.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com


24. Anthony has breached his fiduciary duties by his unreasonable, misguided, and imprudent actions, including but not limited to, his failure to sell the Property and non-payment of the real estate taxes on the Property.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com


25. The breaches of duty by Anthony constitute good cause for his removal as trustee of the Land Trust.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com


WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:
A. That the Court remove Anthony Minor O'Connell as trustee under the Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, pursuant to 26-48 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended);

This is against the law.

B.That all fees payable to Anthony Minor O'Connell under the terms of the aforesaid Land Trust Agreement, including but not limited to, the trustee's compensation under paragraph 9.01, and all interest on advancements by the trustee to the trust for payment of real estate taxes pursuant to paragraph 9.03, be disallowed and deemed forfeited;

This is against the law of contracts.


C. That all costs incurred by Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader in this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees, be paid by the Land Trust; and

This is against the law.


D. For all such further relief as this Court deems reasonable and proper.

This is against the law.


Count 11: Removal of Anthony O'Connell as Trustee of the Trust under the Will of Harold A. O'Connell

This is against the law. puts the accountants and the colaborators in control of the money.

Why did the Trustee's Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report of June 16, 1994, and August 23, 2000, disappear after being received by the Court? See item 28.


26. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 25 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.


27. The terms of the Harold Trust provide that, upon the death of Mrs. O'Connell, the assets are to be distributed to Jean, Sheila, and Anthony in equal shares. Notwithstanding the terms of the Harold Trust and the provisions for its termination, Anthony entered into the Land Trust Agreement in his capacity as trustee of the Harold Trust. As a result, upon the sale of the Property, Anthony can exercise greater control over the Harold Trust's share of the sale proceeds than if the parties held their beneficial interests in their individual capacities.

Why did the Trustee's Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report of June 16, 1994, and August 23, 2000, disappear after being received by the Court? See item 28.
It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com


28. Other than its status as beneficiary of the Land Trust, there is no reason for the continuation of the Harold Trust.

The Testamentary Trust under the Will of H. A. OConnell is not a beneficiary of the 1992 Virginia Land Trust. It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com







Why did the Trustee's Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report of August 23, 2000, disappear after being received by the Court?

Why did the Trustee's actual 12th account dissapear after being received by the Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson?

Why is "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . 659.97" at bk467p192, approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson, not recognized?  

29. On August 8, 2000, an Eleventh Account for the Harold Trust was approved by the Commissioner of Accounts for the Circuit Court of Fairfax County and determined to be a final account.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm o ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com



(Above) On August 8, 2000, the Commisioner of Accounts changed my 1995 11th account from "This is not a final account'' to "This is a final Account" He did not inital or date his change so anyone looking at this would assome that I made the change.

(Below) The Commisioner's Report to the Judges describibg my 12th account (But not including my actual 12th account (red flag) makes my 12th account look bad. My Exception to the Commissioner's Report that contained my actual 12th Trust account and the Comissioner's Report of it to the Judges. for comparison, dissappeared after being excepted by the Court on August 23, 2000.
http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/9-exceptions2000disappeared.pdf



30. Anthony repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged the Commissioner's determination and requested, inter alia, that the Court and the Commissioner of Accounts investigate a debt of $659.97 that he alleged was owed to the Harold Trust by Mrs. O'Connell's estate. In these proceedings, the Commissioner stated, and the court agreed, that there was no evidence to support Anthony's claims that a debt existed and, if so, that it was an asset of the Harold Trust.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

Why is the accounting entry "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . 659.97" at bk467p192, approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson, on March 20, 1993, not recognized? This is an accounting entanglement. The issue is not the anount. The issue is that it entangles.



This is an accounting entanglement. It is a cover-up. The issue is not the anount. The issue is that it entangles. The accounting at bk467p191 is covered with these entangles using small amounts. They cover the accounting trails. The accounting at bk467p191 has been concealed since 1993.

The Commisioner of Accounts approved these three items. That means he approved the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 three times. In the Estate accounting, the Commissioner approved the 816.00 and the 659.97 on March 20, 1993, at Book 467 page 192:

"Int fm Harold O'Connell Trust  .......................................... 816.00"
"Debt fm Harold O’Connell Trust  ...................................... 659.97"

In the Trust accounting, The Commissioner of Accounts approved the 1,475.97 on October 4, 1993, at Book 480 page 1768:

"Payable to the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell ...................$ 1,475.97" 

The issue is not the amount. The issue is that it entangles the Trust accounting with the Estste accounting. . Small numbers are used to make them appear unworthy of investigation, as if the issue were the amount.

The CPA Joanne Barnes created it (1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97). The attorney Edward White framed me with it:

"2. The K-1 filed by the Trust showed a payment of $816.00 in interest to the estate. You sent a check in the amount of $1475.97 to the estate. What was the remaining $659.97? Do I have this confused with the tax debt/credit situation which ran from the Third Accounting?"
(Attorney Edward White to Trustee, Anthony O'Connell, May 19, 1992)

If you can recognize the dynamics in this simple plant of confusion and conflict, you can recognize the same dynamics in others. For example, having Jean Nader make her reimbursement check out to "Fairfax County" when it is for reimbursement to me plants confusion and conflict in the accounting. See item xxx.

http://www.canweconnectthedots.com/plant659/plant659-home.html

Bottom line: The accountants and their collaborators make money disappear. They want me out because I try to expose their accounting. They want my sister Jean Nader in because she does not try to expose the accounting. They make money disappear. They use her as unwitting cover.


31. Anthony's repeated and unsuccessful challenges to the rulings of the Commissioner of Accounts and the Circuit Court in connection with the Eleventh Account, and his persistence in pursuing his unfounded claims to the present day, demonstrate that he is unable to administer the Harold Trust effectively and reliably.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

Bottom line: The accountants and their collaborators make money disappear. They want me out because I try to expose their accounting. They want my sister Jean Nader in because she does not try to expose the accounting. They use her as unwitting cover.











32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

Bottom line: The accountants and their collaborators make money disappear. They want me out because I try to expose their accounting. They want my sister Jean Nader in because she does not try to expose the accounting. They use her as unwitting cover.

















33. The removal of Anthony as trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:

A. That the Court remove Anthony Minor O'Connell as trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, pursuant to § 55-547.06 of the Code of Virginia (1 950, as amended);


B.That all costs incurred by Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Comell Nader in this action including reasonable attorneys' fees, be awarded to her in accordance with § 55- 550.04 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and


C. For all such further relief as this Court deems reasonable and proper.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

Count 111: Appointment of Successor Trustee

This is against the law. For example, the Trust Agreement is not a document that transfer's ownership. The Trust Deed is the document that transfers ownership. Why is the Trust Deed ignored? This rendered me powerlesless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money.

To see if Chief Judge Smith illegally took away my livelihood, my Trusteeship for the Trust property and my farm for my trying to expose the accounting at bk467p191, try exposing the accounting at bk467p191.

Bottom line: The accountants and their collaborators make money disappear. They want me out because I try to expose their accounting. They want my sister Jean Nader in because she does not try to expose the accounting. They use her as unwitting cover.

34. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 33 are incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com


35. Jean is a proper person to serve as trustee of the Land Trust in order to sell the Property on behalf of the beneficiaries of the Land Trust, and she is willing and able to serve in such capacity.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

36. The best interests of the beneficiaries would be served if the Land Trust is continued for a sufficient period of time to allow the successor trustee to sell the Property, rather than allowing the Land Trust to terminate on the date specified in the Land Trust Agreement. Each of the individual beneficiaries of the Land Trust is age 70 or above, and it would be prudent to sell the Property during their lifetimes, if possible, rather than leaving the matter for the next generation to resolve.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

37. Jean is a proper person to serve as trustee of the trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, and she is willing and able to serve in such capacity.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader prays for the following relief:
A. That Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader be appointed as successor trustee under the aforesaid Land Trust Agreement, with the direction to sell the Property upon such terms and conditions as this Court deems reasonable and appropriate, including, but not limited to, fixing a reasonable amount as compensation of the successor trustee for her services;
B. That the term of the Land Trust be continued for a reasonable time in order to allow for the sale of the Property;
C. That Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader be appointed as successor trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell for all purposes, including distribution of the net proceeds of the sale of the Property that are payable to such trust;

D. That all costs incurred by Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader in this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees, be paid by the Land Trust; and E. For all such further relief as this Court deems reasonable and proper.

It is against the law for Chief Judge Smith's Court and the B&K law firm to ignore the 1992 Trust Deed. It rendered me, the Trustee, powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. Please recognize this cause and effect.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

End of complaint with comments


Seventeen (17 ) of my eighteen (18) responses to this Complaint disappeared

Seventeen (17 ) of my eighteen (18) responses to this Complaint disappeared after being received by the Court. These seventeen (17) responses were in one package, USPS El 480187657 US, weighted 6 lbs 1 oz, were received by the Court on September 25, 2012, at 10:44 am, and were signed for by Stephanie Walker. The public doesn't have a chance against this.

http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/Received9-25-12_11p.pdf

1) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/1-545820-23p.pdf
2) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/2-bk467p191-8p.pdf
3) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/3-blueprint4p.pdf
4) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/4-canweconnectthedots2p.pdf
5) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/5-codeofconduct18p.pdf
6) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/6-commitments-Individually8p.pdf
7) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/7-compute-tax-test35p.pdf
8) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/8-exceptions1994disappeared.pdf
9) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/9-exceptions2000disappeared.pdf
10) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/10-overview72p.pdf
11) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/11-percentages12p.pdf
12) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/12-precedence17p.pdf
13) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/13-tax-records94p.pdf
14) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/14-trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf
15) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/15-trust-documents42p.pdf
16) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/16-unknown14p.pdf
17) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/17-usingIRS15p.pdf
http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/all-18responses714p.pdf
http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/disappeared.html